Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Eoplectodonta (Eoplectodonta) transversalis

Strophomenata - Strophomenida - Sowerbyellidae

Taxonomy
Anomites transversalis was named by Wahlenberg (1818). Its type specimen is RMS Br 102394 and is a 3D body fossil.

It was recombined as Plectambonites transversalis by Hall and Clarke (1894); it was recombined as Sowerbyella transversalis by Jones (1928); it was recombined as Plectodonta transversalis by Kozlowski (1929); it was recombined as Ygera transversalis by Havlicek (1967); it was recombined as Eoplectodonta transversalis by Bassett and Cocks (1974); it was recombined as Eoplectodonta (Eoplectodonta) transversalis by Musteikis and Cocks (2004) and Rubel (2011).

Sister species lacking formal opinion data

View classification of included taxa

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1818Anomites transversalis Wahlenberg p. 64
1819Anomites transversalis Wahlenberg p. 64
1894Plectambonites transversalis Hall and Clarke p. 295 figs. pl. 15 f. 34-36
1928Sowerbyella transversalis Jones p. 448
1929Plectodonta transversalis Kozlowski p. 113
1967Ygera transversalis Havlicek p. 58
1974Eoplectodonta transversalis Bassett and Cocks
2004Eoplectodonta (Eoplectodonta) transversalis Musteikis and Cocks p. 470
2011Eoplectodonta (Eoplectodonta) transversalis Rubel

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Protostomia
Spiralia
superphylumLophotrochozoa
Lophophorata
phylumBrachiopodaCuvier 1805
subphylumRhynchonelliformeaWilliams et al. 1996
RankNameAuthor
classStrophomenataWilliams et al 1996
orderStrophomenidaOpik 1934
superfamilyPlectambonitoideaJones 1928
familySowerbyellidaeOpik 1930
subfamilySowerbyellinaeOpik 1930
genusEoplectodontaKozlowski 1929
subgenusEoplectodontaKozlowski 1929
speciestransversalis(Wahlenberg 1818)

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available