Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Osteopygis

Reptilia - Testudines

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1868Osteopygis Cope p. 147
1870Osteopygis Cope p. 132
1884Osteopygis Cope
1902Osteopygis Hay p. 441
1908Osteopygis Hay p. 127
1930Osteopygis Hay p. 75
1953Osteopygis Bohlin p. 69
1953Osteopygis Zangerl p. 205
1963Osteopygis Yeh
1980Osteopygis Foster
1988Osteopygis Carroll
1988Osteopygis Weems p. 115
1995Osteopygis Hirayama p. 282
2002Osteopygis Sepkoski
2005Osteopygis Parham p. 76
2010Osteopygis Brinkman et al.
2023Osteopygis Gentry et al.

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
RankNameAuthor
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
Sauropsida
classReptilia
Testudinata(Oppel 1811)
orderTestudinesBatsch 1788
PancryptodiraJoyce et al. 2004
Macrobaenidae(Sukhanov 1964)
genusOsteopygis

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

G. †Osteopygis Cope 1868
show all | hide all
Osteopygis backmani Russell 1934
Osteopygis emarginata Cope 1868
hide
Invalid names: Amblypeza entellus Hay 1908 [synonym], Catapleura chelydrina Cope 1875 [synonym], Osteopygis borealis Wieland 1904 [synonym], Osteopygis chelydrinus Cope 1868 [synonym], Osteopygis erosus Cope 1875 [synonym], Osteopygis gibbi Wieland 1904 [synonym], Osteopygis platylomus Cope 1870 [synonym], Osteopygis robustus Hay 1908 [synonym]
Osteopygis kranzi Weems 2014
Osteopygis russelli Brinkman 2015
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
O. P. Hay 1908Carapace including 8 pairs of costal plates and 1 1 pairs of peripherals, with all or only a part of the peripherals suturally articulated with the costals and the suprapygals. All the costals sending the ends of their ribs into pits of the corresponding peripherals. Five vertebral and 4 pairs of costal scutes. The nuchal scute much wider than long. Plastron relatively small; its connection with the peripherals extensive, reaching from the second to the eighth peripherals, not by close sutures. Bridge relatively narrow. Fontanels in the midline and at the ends of the hyohypoplastral suture. Inframarginal scutes present. Lower jaw with a broad and flat crushing surface; not beakt.
B. Bohlin 1953Carapace including 8 pairs of costal plates and 11 pairs of peripherals, with all or only a part of the peripherals suturally articulated with the costals and the suprapygals. All the costals sending their ribs into pits of the corresponding peripherals. Five vertebral and 4 pairs of costal scutes. The nuchal scute much wider than long. Plastron relatively small; its connection with the peripherals extensive, reaching from the second to the eighth peripherals, not by closed sutures. Bridge relatively narrow. Fontanels in the midline and at the ends of the hyohypoplastral suture. Inframarginal scutes present. Lower jaw with a broad and flat crushing surface; not beaked. (Hay 1908 p. 127).
A. D. Gentry et al. 2023Osteopygis can be differentiated from A. ebersolei and J. sukhanovi by the presence of a central plastral fenestra and from A. gaffneyi in having an ovoid carapace that is longer than wide.