Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Edopoidea

Taxonomy
Edopoidea was named by Romer (1945) [Phylogenetic definition (from Schoch 2013): The most inclusive clade containing Edops craigi but not Mastodonsaurus giganteus. ]. It is not extant. It was considered monophyletic by Schoch (2013).

It was reranked as the unranked clade Edopoidea by Schoch (2013).

It was assigned to Rhachitomi by Carroll (1967); to Temnospondyli by Carroll (1988) and Sidor et al. (2005); and to Temnospondyli by Sequeira (2004), Schoch (2013) and Schoch and Milner (2014).

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1945Edopoidea Romer
1967Edopoidea Carroll p. 113
1988Edopoidea Carroll
2004Edopoidea Sequeira p. 37
2005Edopoidea Sidor et al. p. 886
2013Edopoidea Schoch
2014Edopoidea Schoch and Milner

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Triploblastica
Nephrozoa
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1847
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
RankNameAuthor
Sarcopterygii
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda()
Temnospondyli()
superfamilyEdopoideaRomer 1945
superfamilyEdopoideaRomer 1945

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available