Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Cteniogenys
Taxonomy
Cteniogenys was named by Gilmore (1928). It is not extant. Its type is Cteniogenys antiquus. It is the type genus of Cteniogenidae, Cteniogenyidae.
It was assigned to Sauria by Gilmore (1928) and Hay (1930); to Eolacertilia by Prothero and Estes (1980); to Kuehneosauridae by Estes (1983) and Carroll (1988); to Cteniogenidae by Gao and Fox (1998) and Foster and Trujillo (2000); to Choristodera by Ezcurra (2016); to Choristodera by Evans (1989), Evans (1990), Evans (1991), Matsumoto and Evans (2010), Matsumoto et al. (2013) and Matsumoto et al. (2019); and to Cteniogenyidae by Seiffert (1975) and Allain et al. (2022).
It was assigned to Sauria by Gilmore (1928) and Hay (1930); to Eolacertilia by Prothero and Estes (1980); to Kuehneosauridae by Estes (1983) and Carroll (1988); to Cteniogenidae by Gao and Fox (1998) and Foster and Trujillo (2000); to Choristodera by Ezcurra (2016); to Choristodera by Evans (1989), Evans (1990), Evans (1991), Matsumoto and Evans (2010), Matsumoto et al. (2013) and Matsumoto et al. (2019); and to Cteniogenyidae by Seiffert (1975) and Allain et al. (2022).
Species
C. antiquus (syn. C. reedi) (type species)
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1928 | Cteniogenys Gilmore p. 162 |
1930 | Cteniogenys Hay p. 256 |
1975 | Cteniogenys Seiffert p. 14 |
1980 | Cteniogenys Prothero and Estes p. 484 |
1983 | Cteniogenys Estes |
1988 | Cteniogenys Carroll |
1989 | Cteniogenys Evans p. 586 |
1990 | Cteniogenys Evans |
1991 | Cteniogenys Evans |
1998 | Cteniogenys Gao and Fox p. 306 |
2000 | Cteniogenys Foster and Trujillo p. 14 |
2010 | Cteniogenys Matsumoto and Evans |
2013 | Cteniogenys Matsumoto et al. |
2016 | Cteniogenys Ezcurra pp. 270, 282 |
2019 | Cteniogenys Matsumoto et al. |
2022 | Cteniogenys Allain et al. |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
G. †Cteniogenys Gilmore 1928
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
K. -Q. Gao and R. C. Fox 1998 | Small choristoderes that differ from other members of the order by the following derived character states: contact between premaxillae and nasals lost; orbits significantly narrowed and elongated relative to skull dimensions; frontals subrectangular, anterior border of which retracted slightly posterior to anterior level of orbits; dorsal process of maxilla prominent, confined to anterior part of maxilla, and slightly inrolled dorsally; prefrontal short, widened, having elongate palatal process. The genus is further distinguished from mroe derived neochoristoderans in having separate postorbital and postfrontal, both entering orbital rim; quadrate with weakly developed quadratojugal process; marginal teeth short, with striated crowns; tooth bases having large replacement pits, but lacking basal plicidentine infolding. |