| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Procerberus
Taxonomy
Procerberus was named by Sloan and Van Valen (1965). It is not extant. It was considered monophyletic by Rook et al. (2010).
It was assigned to Procerberinae by Sloan and Van Valen (1965) and Van Valen (1967); to Palaeoryctidae by Kielan-Jaworowska et al. (1979); and to Cimolestidae by McKenna and Bell (1997), Kielan-Jaworowska et al. (2004), Lopatin (2006), Rook et al. (2010) and Williamson et al. (2011).
It was assigned to Procerberinae by Sloan and Van Valen (1965) and Van Valen (1967); to Palaeoryctidae by Kielan-Jaworowska et al. (1979); and to Cimolestidae by McKenna and Bell (1997), Kielan-Jaworowska et al. (2004), Lopatin (2006), Rook et al. (2010) and Williamson et al. (2011).
Species
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1965 | Procerberus Sloan and Van Valen |
| 1967 | Procerberus Van Valen |
| 1979 | Procerberus Kielan-Jaworowska et al. p. 223 |
| 1997 | Procerberus McKenna and Bell |
| 2004 | Procerberus Kielan-Jaworowska et al. pp. 494, 508-509 fig. 13.25B |
| 2006 | Procerberus Lopatin |
| 2010 | Procerberus Rook et al. p. 1222 |
| 2011 | Procerberus Williamson et al. p. 174 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
G. †Procerberus Sloan and Van Valen 1965
show all | hide all
†Procerberus andesiticus Middleton and Dewar 2004
†Procerberus formicarum Sloan and Van Valen 1965
†Procerberus grandis Middleton and Dewar 2004
†Procerberus plutonis Van Valen 1978
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available