|Basic info||Taxonomic history||Classification||Relationships|
|Morphology||Ecology and taphonomy||External Literature Search||Age range and collections|
It was reranked as the unranked clade Erinaceomorpha by Gregory (1910), Smith et al. (2002), Scott (2006) and Silcox et al. (2010); it was reranked as the order Erinaceomorpha by McKenna (1975); it was considered an invalid subgroup of Eulipotyphla by Douady et al. (2002).
It was assigned to Lipotyphla by Gregory (1910); to Insectivora by McKenna (1975); to Insectivora by Novacek et al. (1985); to Lipotyphla by Hooker (1986), Smith et al. (2002), Lopatin (2006), Scott (2006) and Dunn and Rasmussen (2009); and to Eulipotyphla by Silcox et al. (2010) and Rose et al. (2012).
|Year||Name and author|
|1910||Erinaceomorpha Gregory p. 464|
|1967||Creotarsinae Van Valen|
|1975||Erinaceomorpha McKenna p. 42|
|1985||Erinaceomorpha Novacek et al. p. 3|
|1986||Erinaceomorpha Hooker p. 223|
|1997||Creotarsidae McKenna and Bell|
|2002||Erinaceomorpha Smith et al. p. 374|
|2006||Erinaceomorpha Scott p. 1697|
|2009||Erinaceomorpha Dunn and Rasmussen p. 322|
|2010||Erinaceomorpha Silcox et al.|
|2012||Erinaceomorpha Rose et al.|
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.