| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Taxonomy
Cuon was named by Hodgson (1838). It is extant.
It was assigned to Canina by Wang et al. (2008) and Tedford et al. (2009); and to Canidae by Hodgson (1838), Bourguignat (1875), Kurten (1968), van Gelder (1978), Kurten and Anderson (1980), Carroll (1988), Wilson and Reeder (2005) and Mecozzi et al. (2020).
It was assigned to Canina by Wang et al. (2008) and Tedford et al. (2009); and to Canidae by Hodgson (1838), Bourguignat (1875), Kurten (1968), van Gelder (1978), Kurten and Anderson (1980), Carroll (1988), Wilson and Reeder (2005) and Mecozzi et al. (2020).
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1838 | Cuon Hodgson |
| 1846 | Cyon Agassiz |
| 1875 | Cuon Bourguignat |
| 1914 | Cyon Barbour p. 190 |
| 1968 | Cuon Kurten p. 111 |
| 1978 | Cuon van Gelder |
| 1980 | Cuon Kurten and Anderson p. 172 |
| 1988 | Cuon Carroll |
| 2005 | Cuon Wilson and Reeder |
| 2008 | Cuon Wang et al. |
| 2009 | Cuon Tedford et al. p. 157 |
| 2020 | Cuon Mecozzi et al. |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
G. Cuon Hodgson 1838 [dhole]
show all | hide all
Cuon alpinus Pallas 1811 [dhole]
†Cuon alpinus europaeus Bourguignat 1875
†Cuon bourreti Harlé 1891
†Cuon dukhunensis Sykes 1831
†Cuon majori Del Campana 1913
†Cuon priscus Thenius 1954
†Cuon sumatrensis Hardwicke 1822
Invalid names: Cyon Agassiz 1846 [objective synonym]
Diagnosis
| Reference | Diagnosis | |
|---|---|---|
| R. H. Tedford et al. 2009 | The osteological differentiation of species of Cuon from those of Xenocyon, and the morphologically related Lycaon pictus, lies principally in the extreme hyper- carnivory of Cuon spp.: loss of m3; reduction of m2 to single or poorly differentiated double-rooted condition with further simpli- fication of crown involving great reduction and loss of metaconid so that it resembles m3 of other canines; loss of m1 entoconid and any remnant of the cristid connecting it with hypoconid, and further reduction of metaco- nid to very small size and loss (usually as individual variation in Cuon populations); anterior premolars also with prominent, high- crowned principal cusps, p2 and p3 usually with posterior cusp; large p4 whose principal cusp is as high or higher than m1 paraconid, and presence of shelflike anterior cingulum that may be produced into anterior cusp; M1 lacking hypocone, although there may be remnant of posterolingual cingulum; M2 very reduced, but retaining tribosphenic form. |