|Basic info||Taxonomic history||Classification||Relationships|
|Morphology||Ecology and taphonomy||External Literature Search||Age range and collections|
It was synonymized subjectively with Anicanodonta by Gregory (1910); it was reranked as the suborder Pilosa by McKenna (1975); it was reranked as the order Pilosa by Delsuc et al. (2001); it was reranked as the unranked clade Pilosa by McDonald and Naples (2007).
It was assigned to Edentata by McKenna (1975); to Edentata by Flower (1883) and Thurmond and Jones (1981); to Xenarthra by Paula Couto (1956) and MacFadden et al. (1993); to Xenarthra by Carroll (1988), Gaudin (1995), Gaudin and Branham (1998), McDonald and Naples (2007) and McDonald et al. (2013); and to Xenarthra by Delsuc et al. (2001) and McDonald and Carranza-Castañeda (2017).
|Year||Name and author|
|1883||Pilosa Flower p. 184|
|1889||Anicanodonta Ameghino p. 657|
|1894||Anicanodonta Ameghino p. 141|
|1906||Anicanodonta Ameghino p. 91|
|1910||Anicanodonta Gregory p. 465|
|1956||Pilosa Paula Couto p. 99|
|1975||Pilosa McKenna p. 40|
|1981||Pilosa Thurmond and Jones p. 177|
|1993||Pilosa MacFadden et al. p. 235|
|1998||Pilosa Gaudin and Branham|
|2001||Pilosa Delsuc et al.|
|2007||Pilosa McDonald and Naples p. 154|
|2013||Pilosa McDonald et al. p. 1227|
|2017||Pilosa McDonald and Carranza-Castañeda|
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.