Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Eoconodon nidhoggi

Mammalia - Acreodi - Triisodontidae

Taxonomy

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1978Eoconodon nidhoggi Van Valen
2011Eoconodon nidhoggi Clemens

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
RankNameAuthor
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
classMammalia
Theriamorpha(Rowe 1993)
Theriiformes()
Trechnotheria
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Placentalia
Boreoeutheria
Laurasiatheria
Scrotifera
orderAcreodiMatthew 1909
familyTriisodontidae
genusEoconodon
speciesnidhoggi

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Eoconodon nidhoggi Van Valen 1978
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
W. A. Clemens 2011As far as they are known the lengths and widths of the molars are smaller than of those of the other species of Eoconodon except E. ginibitohia. Dimensions of m2 and m3 of the type and only specimen of E. ginibitohia are either slightly smaller than or fall within the lower end of the observed ranges of variation in the small samples of homologous teeth of E. nidhoggi (Table 1). The m2 and m3 of E. nidhoggi are distinguishable from those of E. ginibitohia by: 1) relatively larger paraconids; 2) talonid cusps of m2 and, probably, m3 are relatively larger and more distinct; 3) the basal cingulid is better developed and complete across the labial side of the trigonid, and 4) the talonid of m3 is broader than its trigonid. E. nidhoggi resembles E. coryphaeus in the greater length of m3 relative to m2. In E. ginibitohia the length of m3 is slightly smaller (99%) than that of m2. In contrast, the mean length of m3 of the new species described below is distinctly shorter (77%) than that of m2.
Measurements
No measurements are available
Composition: phosphaticsubp
Environment: terrestrialsubc
Locomotion: actively mobilec
Life habit: scansorialsubc
Diet: omnivoref
Reproduction: viviparoussubc
Created: 2011-04-24 19:43:41
Modified: 2011-04-24 04:43:41
Source: f = family, subc = subclass, c = class, subp = subphylum
References: Hendy et al. 2009, Ji et al. 2002, Tabuce et al. 2011, Carroll 1988, Lillegraven 1979

Age range: Puercan or 66.00000 to 63.30000 Ma

Collections (7 total)


Time interval Ma Country or state Original ID and collection number
Pu366.0 - 63.3USA (Montana) Eoconodon nidhoggi (14738 218647)
Puercan66.0 - 63.3USA (Montana) Eoconodon nidhoggi (14745 218648 218649 218650) Eoconodon sp. (14766)