Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Miohippus annectens
Taxonomy
Miohippus annectens was named by Marsh (1874) [genotype]. Its type specimen is YPM 11275, a set of teeth (eleven upper molar and premolar teeth), and it is a 3D body fossil. It is the type species of Miohippus.
It was recombined as Mesohippus annectens by Matthew (1899).
It was recombined as Mesohippus annectens by Matthew (1899).
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1874 | Miohippus annectens Marsh p. 168 |
1899 | Mesohippus annectens Matthew |
1902 | Miohippus annectens Hay p. 613 |
1904 | Miohippus crassicuspis Osborn |
1904 | Miohippus annectens Osborn p. 168 |
1904 | Miohippus crassicuspis Osborn p. 178 |
1918 | Miohippus crassicuspis Osborn p. 57 figs. Plate 3.11. Text Fig. 35. |
1918 | Miohippus annectens Osborn p. 63 figs. Plate 3.14,15. Text Fig. 43 |
1930 | Miohippus annectens Hay |
1940 | Miohippus annectens Stirton p. 172 |
1940 | Miohippus crassicuspis Stirton p. 172 |
1998 | Miohippus annectens MacFadden p. 544 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Miohippus annectens Marsh 1874
show all | hide all
Invalid names: Miohippus crassicuspis Osborn 1904 [synonym]
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
H. F. Osborn 1918 | (Marsh, 1874, pp. 249-250) Based upon type and cotype specimens (Yale Mus. 11275, 11282, 12230).
(1) Anterior margin of orbit above front of third superior molar. (2) Enamel of all teeth preserved, smooth; (3) prominent tubercle in medivallum but no internal cingulum. (4) Distinguished from Miohippus (A.) condoni as follows: (5) in M. (A.) condoni the enamel is rugose; (6) small cusp [hypostyle] behind the posterior crest is parallel with the posterior basal ridge [cingulum] and (7) the inner tubercle between the transverse crests is entirely wanting. (8) The size of the animal exceeds that of a sheep, with longer limbs. | |
H. F. Osborn 1918 (Miohippus crassicuspis) | (Osborn, 1904, p. 179, 1918) (1) Type premolars belong to an animal of larger size than the types of M. intermedius, M. validus, or M. gidleyi. (2) Much interrupted transverse crests of the premolars, the cones and conules quite distinct and separate, a character to which the specific name M. crassicuspis refers; (3) internal cingulum strong but not continuous; (4) in the medivallum are low transverse ridges which rise into cuspules in the related species M. annectens; (5) sides of the protoloph and metaloph crenulate as in M . gidleyi; (6) hypostyle a strong transverse crest nearly separated from posterior cingulum; (7) external cingulum tending to surround parastyle. |