Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Perchoerus nanus

Mammalia - Tayassuidae

Taxonomy
Thinohyus nanus was named by Marsh (1894) [also said to be 1892]. Its type specimen is YPM 11784, a mandible, and it is a 3D body fossil.

It was synonymized subjectively with Perchoerus probus by Pearson (1923); it was considered a nomen dubium by Wright (1998); it was recombined as Perchoerus nanus by Hay (1902), Scott (1940), Prothero (2009) and Prothero (2021).

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1894Thinohyus nanus Marsh p. 271 fig. 28
1902Perchoerus nanus Hay p. 657
1940Perchoerus nanus Scott p. 502
2009Perchoerus nanus Prothero p. 515
2021Perchoerus nanus Prothero p. 7

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
RankNameAuthor
classMammalia
Theriamorpha(Rowe 1993)
Theriiformes()
Trechnotheria
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Placentalia
Boreoeutheria
Laurasiatheria
Scrotifera
Euungulata
Artiodactylamorpha
Artiodactyla()
superfamilySuoidea
Suina(Gray 1868)
familyTayassuidae
genusPerchoerusLeidy 1869
speciesnanus()

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Perchoerus nanus Marsh 1894
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
D. R. Prothero 2009medium-size species of Perchoerus (ml-3 length = 38-44 mm); distinguished from P. minor by its larger size, slightly larger teeth, and more elongate and complex hypoconulid on m3; distinguished from P. probus by its much smaller size, slightly smaller cheek teeth, trapezoid-shaped upper molars, much smaller M3 with a reduced metacone and posterior cingulum, and shorter m3 hypoconulid with more complex cusp patterns.