Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Pogonodon platycopis

Mammalia - Carnivora - Nimravidae

Taxonomy
Hoplophoneus platycopis was named by Cope (1879). It is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is John Day Units E and F, which is in an Arikareean terrestrial horizon in the John Day Formation of Oregon.

It was recombined as Dinictis platycopis by Adams (1896) and Macdonald (1970); it was recombined as Nimravus platycopis by Matthew (1910) and Fremd (1994); it was recombined as Pogonodon platycopis by Cope (1880), Merriam (1906), Thorpe (1920), Eaton (1922) and Bryant (1996).

Synonyms
Synonymy list
YearName and author
1879Hoplophoneus platycopis Cope p. 798b
1880Pogonodon platycopis Cope p. 847
1896Dinictis platycopis Adams
1906Pogonodon platycopis Merriam
1910Nimravus platycopis Matthew
1920Pogonodon platycopis Thorpe
1922Pogonodon platycopis Eaton
1922Pogonodon serrulidens Eaton
1970Dinictis platycopis Macdonald
1994Nimravus platycopis Fremd
1996Pogonodon platycopis Bryant

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Triploblastica
Nephrozoa
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1847
OlfactoresJefferies 1991
subphylumVertebrata
Gnathostomata()
Osteichthyes()
Sarcopterygii
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda()
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
Batrachosauria()
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
Synapsida()
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
RankNameAuthor
Epicynodontia
infraorderEucynodontia
Probainognathia
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
classMammalia
subclassTribosphenida()
infraclassEutheria()
Placentalia
Laurasiatheria
Scrotifera
Ferae()
CarnivoramorphaWyss and Flynn 1993
CarnivoraformesFlynn et al.
orderCarnivoraBowditch 1821
suborderFeliformiaKretzoi 1945
familyNimravidaeCope 1880
subfamilyNimravinaeTrouessart 1885
genusPogonodonCope 1880
speciesplatycopis()

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available