Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Vulpavus canavus
Taxonomy
Miacis canavus was named by Cope (1881) [misattributed to Matthew 1915 by Guthrie 1971].
It was recombined as Uintacyon canavus by Wortman and Matthew (1899) and Hay (1902); it was recombined as Prodaphaenus canavus by Wortman (1901); it was recombined as Vulpavus canavus by Matthew (1909) and Matthew and Granger (1915).
It was recombined as Uintacyon canavus by Wortman and Matthew (1899) and Hay (1902); it was recombined as Prodaphaenus canavus by Wortman (1901); it was recombined as Vulpavus canavus by Matthew (1909) and Matthew and Granger (1915).
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1881 | Miacis canavus Cope p. 189 |
1881 | Miacis brevirostris Cope p. 190 |
1892 | Miacis brevirostris Scott p. 320 |
1892 | Miacis canavus Scott p. 320 |
1899 | Uintacyon brevirostris Wortman and Matthew p. 112 |
1899 | Uintacyon canavus Wortman and Matthew p. 112 |
1901 | Prodaphaenus canavus Wortman |
1902 | Uintacyon brevirostris Hay p. 760 |
1902 | Uintacyon canavus Hay p. 760 |
1909 | Vulpavus canavus Matthew |
1915 | Vulpavus canavus Matthew and Granger |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Vulpavus canavus Cope 1881
show all | hide all
Invalid names: Miacis brevirostris Cope 1881 [synonym]
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available