Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Neogale vison (mink)
Taxonomy
Putorius vison was named by Schreber (1777). It is extant.
It was recombined as Mustela vison by Gidley (1913), Hay (1914), Hay (1923), Hay (1930), Hall (1936), Kurten and Anderson (1980), Mead and Mead (1989) and Marmi et al. (2004); it was recombined as Lutreola vison by Matthew (1915); it was recombined as Neovison vison by Baryshnikov (2009); it was recombined as Neogale vison by Patterson et al. (2021).
It was recombined as Mustela vison by Gidley (1913), Hay (1914), Hay (1923), Hay (1930), Hall (1936), Kurten and Anderson (1980), Mead and Mead (1989) and Marmi et al. (2004); it was recombined as Lutreola vison by Matthew (1915); it was recombined as Neovison vison by Baryshnikov (2009); it was recombined as Neogale vison by Patterson et al. (2021).
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1777 | Putorius vison Schreber |
1902 | Putorius vison Hay p. 768 |
1913 | Mustela vison Gidley |
1914 | Mustela vison Hay |
1915 | Lutreola vison Matthew |
1923 | Mustela vison Hay |
1930 | Mustela vison Hay |
1936 | Mustela vison Hall |
1980 | Mustela vison Kurten and Anderson p. 151 |
1989 | Mustela vison Mead and Mead p. 150 |
2004 | Mustela vison Marmi et al. p. 489 |
2009 | Neovison vison Baryshnikov p. 75 |
2021 | Neogale vison Patterson et al. |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Neogale vison Schreber 1777 [mink]
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available