Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Chriacus baldwini

Mammalia - Arctocyonidae

Taxonomy
Deltatherium baldwini was named by Cope (1882). It is a 3D body fossil.

It was synonymized subjectively with Chriacus pelvidens by Rigby (1976); it was recombined as Chriacus baldwini by Cope (1888), Scott (1892), Osborn and Earle (1895), Matthew (1897), Matthew (1937), Van Valen (1978), Tsentas (1981) and Rose (1996).

Synonyms
Synonymy list
YearName and author
1882Deltatherium baldwini Cope p. 463
1883Deltatherium baldwini Cope p. 282
1884Tricentes crassicollidens Cope p. 315
1888Chriacus baldwini Cope
1888Chriacus schlosserianus Cope
1892Chriacus baldwini Scott p. 296
1892Epichriacus schlosserianus Scott p. 296
1892Tricentes crassicollidens Scott p. 297
1895Chriacus baldwini Osborn and Earle
1895Chriacus schlosserianus Osborn and Earle
1897Chriacus baldwini Matthew
1897Epichriacus schlosserianus Matthew
1935Metachriacus provocator Simpson
1935Spanoxyodon latrunculus Simpson
1937Chriacus baldwini Matthew
1941Oxyclaenus pearcei Gazin
1978Chriacus baldwini Van Valen
1981Tricentes provocator Rose
1981Chriacus baldwini Tsentas
1987Chriacus provocator Archibald et al.
1996Chriacus baldwini Rose p. 1707

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Triploblastica
Nephrozoa
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1847
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
Sarcopterygii
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda()
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
Batrachosauria()
Cotylosauria()
RankNameAuthor
Amniota
Synapsida()
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Epicynodontia
infraorderEucynodontia
Probainognathia
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
classMammalia
subclassTribosphenida()
infraclassEutheria()
familyArctocyonidaeMurray 1866
genusChriacusCope 1883
speciesbaldwini()

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available