Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Remingtonocetus harudiensis

Mammalia - Artiodactyla - Remingtonocetidae

Taxonomy
Protocetus harudiensis was named by Sahni and Mishra (1975). Its type specimen is LUVP 11037, a partial skeleton, and it is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is Harudi, which is in a Lutetian shallow subtidal mudstone in the Harudi Formation of India.

It was recombined as Remingtonocetus harudiensis by Kumar and Sahni (1986), Bajpai and Thewissen (1998), Thewissen et al. (2001), Gingerich et al. (2001), McLeod and Barnes (2008), Bajpai et al. (2011), Gingerich (2012) and Cooper et al. (2014).

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1975Protocetus harudiensis Sahni and Mishra p. 21
1986Remingtonocetus harudiensis Kumar and Sahni p. 330 figs. Fig. 3-10
1998Remingtonocetus harudiensis Bajpai and Thewissen p. 215
2001Remingtonocetus harudiensis Gingerich et al. p. 289
2001Remingtonocetus harudiensis Thewissen et al. p. 351 figs. Table 1
2008Remingtonocetus harudiensis McLeod and Barnes p. 93
2011Remingtonocetus harudiensis Bajpai et al. p. 703
2012Remingtonocetus harudiensis Gingerich p. 313 figs. Figure 4
2014Remingtonocetus harudiensis Cooper et al. p. 91

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Triploblastica
Nephrozoa
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1847
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
Sarcopterygii
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda()
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
Batrachosauria()
Cotylosauria()
RankNameAuthor
Amniota
Synapsida()
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Epicynodontia
infraorderEucynodontia
Probainognathia
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
classMammalia
orderArtiodactyla()
Cetacea()
familyRemingtonocetidae
subfamilyRemingtonocetinae
genusRemingtonocetus
speciesharudiensis()

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available