Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Sabiaceae

Angiospermae - Proteales - Sabiaceae

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1851Sabiaceae von Blume
1941Sabiaceae MacGinitie
1961Sabiaceae Chandler p. 111
1962Sabiaceae Chandler p. 100
1963Sabiaceae Chandler p. 99
1977Sabiaceae Hickey
2000Sabiaceae Mabberley
2016Sabiaceae The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group pp. 6, 16

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomPlantae
phylumSpermatophyta
classAngiospermae
Mesangiosperms
RankNameAuthor
EudicotsDoyle and Hotton 1991
orderProtealesJussieu 1829
familySabiaceaevon Blume 1851
familySabiaceaevon Blume 1851

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Fm. †Sabiaceae von Blume 1851
show all | hide all
G. †Bognoria Chandler 1961
hide
Bognoria venablesi Chandler 1961
G. Meliosma Blume 1823
hide
Meliosma cantiensis Reid and Chandler 1933
Meliosma eopinnata Prasad 2006
Meliosma jenkinsi Chandler 1961
Meliosma longifolia Hickey 1977
Meliosma rostellata Crane et al. 1990
Meliosma sheppeyensis Reid and Chandler 1933
Meliosma truncata MacGinitie 1941
G. Sabia Colebrooke 1819
hide
Sabia eopaniculata Prasad 1994
Sabia siwalica Dwivedi et al. 2006
G. †Sabiocaulis Stopes and Fujii 1910
hide
Sabiocaulis sakuraii Stopes and Fujii 1910
G. †Sabioxylon Maedler 1939
hide
Sabioxylon francofurtense Maedler 1939
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group 2016We move Sabiaceae into Proteales on the basis of strong support found by Sun et al. (2016). Bootstrap support for this placement was not strong in earlier studies (Ruhfel et al., 2014, 63%; Soltis et al., 2011, 59%).