| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Resedaceae (disused)
Taxonomy
Resedaceae was named by von Berchtold and Presl (1820).
It was assigned to Capparidales by Mabberley (2000); and to Brassicales by The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016).
It was assigned to Capparidales by Mabberley (2000); and to Brassicales by The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016).
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1820 | Resedaceae von Berchtold and Presl |
| 2000 | Resedaceae Mabberley |
| 2016 | Resedaceae The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group pp. 7, 18 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Fm. †Resedaceae von Berchtold and Presl 1820
show all | hide all
Invalid names: Borthwickiaceae Su et al [synonym], Stixidaceae Doweld [synonym]
Diagnosis
| Reference | Diagnosis | |
|---|---|---|
| The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group 2016 | Su et al. (2012) showed that Borthwickia W.W.Sm., Forchhammeria Liebm., Stixis Lour. and Tirania Pierre are collectively paraphyletic to Resedaceae and described Borthwickiaceae, whereas a separate Stixidaceae (as ‘Stixaceae’) had been previously proposed by Doweld & Reveal (2008). Here we include Borthwickiaceae and Stixidaceae in an expanded Resedaceae, members of which share some morphological characters (e.g. flowers with many stamens), although some share more characters with Gyrostemonaceae than with core Resedaceae. This prevents unneccesary inflation of family names. Cleome L. has been shown to be grossly paraphyletic to the other previously recognized genera of Cleomaceae (Feodorova et al., 2010; Patchell, Roalson & Hall, 2014), leaving perhaps only a single genus in that family. |