| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Orobanchaceae (disused)
Taxonomy
Orobanchaceae was named by Ventenat (1799).
It was assigned to Scrophulariales by Mabberley (2000); and to Lamiales by The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016).
It was assigned to Scrophulariales by Mabberley (2000); and to Lamiales by The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016).
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1799 | Orobanchaceae Ventenat |
| 2000 | Orobanchaceae Mabberley |
| 2016 | Orobanchaceae The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group pp. 8, 20 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Fm. †Orobanchaceae Ventenat 1799
show all | hide all
Invalid names: Lindenbergiaceae Doweld [synonym], Rehmanniaceae Reveal [synonym]
Diagnosis
| Reference | Diagnosis | |
|---|---|---|
| The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group 2016 | Rehmannia Libosch. ex Fisch. & C.A.Mey. as sister to Orobanchaceae (not in Scrophulariaceae, as previously thought; Xia, Wang & Smith, 2009; RefulioRodrıguez & Olmstead, 2014).
387 [376]. *Orobanchaceae Vent., nom. cons. (including Lindenbergiaceae Doweld, Rehmanniaceae Reveal) |
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Source: p = phylum | |||||
| Reference: Kiessling 2009 | |||||
Collections
No collection or age range data are available