Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Thecodontosaurus antiquus
Taxonomy
Thecodontosaurus antiquus was named by Morris (1843). Its type specimen is BCM 1836 and is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is Durdham Down, Quarry Steps, which is in a Rhaetian fissure fill limestone/breccia in the Magnesian Conglomerate Formation of the United Kingdom. It was considered monophyletic by Yates (2003).
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1843 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Morris p. 211 |
1846 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Plieninger p. 150 |
1850 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus King p. 238 |
1852 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Quenstedt p. 109 |
1855 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Meyer p. 158 |
1856 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Emmons p. 296 |
1856 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Roemer p. 785 |
1859 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Owen p. 140 |
1860 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Owen p. 248 |
1861 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Gervais p. 251 |
1861 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Owen p. 275 |
1866 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Haeckel p. CXXXIV |
1869 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Gervais p. 219 |
1888 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Lydekker p. 175 |
1890 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Woodward and Sherborn p. 291 |
1895 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Seeley p. 144 |
1901 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Nopcsa p. 198 |
1905 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Huene p. 349 |
1907 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Sauvage p. 14 |
1908 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Huene p. 13 |
1909 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Allen p. 276 |
1910 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Hay p. 12 |
1914 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Huene p. 12 |
1918 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Haughton p. 469 |
1920 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Van Hoepen pp. 91-92 |
1929 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Huene p. 271 |
1939 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Kuhn p. 61 |
1941 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Huene p. 141 |
1941 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Young p. 206 |
1957 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Robinson p. 262 |
1964 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Tatarinov p. 541 |
1970 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Demathieu p. 154 |
1970 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Steel p. 50 |
1973 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Galton p. 248 |
1976 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Galton and Cluver p. 139 |
1993 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Storrs p. 448 |
2000 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Benton et al. p. 81 |
2000 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Galton p. 267 |
2000 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Schouten p. 73 |
2003 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Yates |
2004 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Galton and Upchurch p. 236 |
2005 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Galton p. 61A |
2005 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Yates p. 117 |
2006 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Scanlon p. 276 |
2007 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Galton p. 560 |
2007 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Galton et al. p. 120 |
2007 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Naish and Martill p. 496 |
2007 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Smith and Pol p. 661 |
2007 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Upchurch et al. p. 76 |
2009 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Bittencourt and Kellner p. 9 |
2010 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Langer et al. p. 77 |
2010 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Yates p. 744 |
2011 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Apaldetti et al. p. 4 |
2012 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus van den Berg et al. p. 641 |
2016 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Griffin and Nesbitt p. 1 |
2020 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Ballell et al. p. 2 |
2020 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Dalla Vecchia p. 609 |
2021 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Ballell et al. p. 541 |
2021 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Müller and Garcia p. 7 |
2022 | Thecodontosaurus antiquus Ballell et al. p. 2 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Thecodontosaurus antiquus Morris 1843
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
M. J. Benton et al. 2000 | Small, gracile prosauropod (up to 2 m), distinguished primarily on the absence of derived characters seen in other prosauropods. Autapomorphies:
1. Elongate basipterygoid processes in the braincase. The height measured from the top of the parasphenoid to the distal tip of the basipterygoid process is equal to the height of the braincase measured from the top of the parasphenoid to the top of the supraoccipital (Fig. 6B), whereas other prosauropods for which braincases are known share the primitive character of considerably shorter basipterygoid processes. This character is seen also in sauropods (J. Wilson, pers. comm., 1999), but its homology has to be assessed. 2. Dentary less than half length of mandible. The dentary, though damaged (Figs. 3, 4), appears to be relatively complete, and it is short compared to that of other early dinosaurs. If the juvenile specimens from South Wales ascribed to Thecodontosaurus sp. are correctly identified, then the relative shortness of the dentary is confirmed. 3. Posterior process of iliac blade subquadratic. The posterior process of the iliac blade in several specimens of T. antiquus has a distinctly squared termination (Fig. 15A, B), whereas other prosauropods, and other early dinosaurs, have a rounded termination to the posterior process. | |
A. M. Yates 2003 | Small, gracile sauropodomorphs with the following derived character states. 1. The basipterygoid processes are elongate and slender, with the length of the process, measured from its tip to the dorsal margin of the parabasisphenoid, being equal to the
height of the braincase, measured from the dorsal margin of the parabasisphenoid to the top of the supraoccipital (convergent in ‘Efraasia diagnostica’). 2. The dentary is short and deep, occupying less than 40% of the total mandibular length, and with a maximum dor- soventral depth that is greater than 20% of its length (convergent in Saturnalia tupiniquim). 3. The epipophyses of the cranial cervicals are flat plates that overhang the caudal margins of the postzygapophyseal facets but do not form raised ridges on the dorsal surface of the postzygapophysis. 4. The proximal and mid-caudal neural spines are positioned at the extreme caudal end of their neural arches, filling the interpostzygapophyseal space (convergent in ‘Efraasia diagnostica’). 5. The ventral furrowing of the caudal centra is reduced so that it is only weakly present in the proximal caudals and is absent altogether from the mid and distal caudals. | |
P. M. Galton 2007 | as in Pantydraco caducus, the dentary is short and deep, with a maximum dorsoventral depth that is greater than 20 % of its length, and teeth are plesiomorphic in all being recurved in lateral view. Based on the type Clifton material, Thecodontosaurus antiquus has no autapomorphies or a unique combination of characters and the diagnosis awaits description of the referred material from Tytherington. | |
A. Ballell et al. 2020 | A sauropodomorph dinosaur distinguished from other basal sauropodomorphs by the following combination of characters (autapomorphies indicated with an asterisk): absence of a postorbital flange; maxillary and dentary tooth crowns not recurved and with coarse serrations; extensive muscle scar for the origin of M. triceps brachii caput scapulare on the lateral side of the glenoid lip of the scapula*; elaborate humeral cuboid fossa with a bilobate proximal outline and extensively pitted surface*; reduced brevis fossa and shelf; incompletely perforated acetabulum; absence of a femoral trochanteric shelf; and posterolateral descending process of the tibia anteroposteriorly wide and mediolaterally narrow, not reaching the lateral extent of the anterolateral process* (convergent with Anchisaurus, Eucnemesaurus entaxonis, Aardonyx, and Sauropoda). |