| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Bonitasaura
Taxonomy
Bonitasaura was named by Apesteguía (2004). It was considered monophyletic by Gallina and Apesteguía (2011).
It was assigned to Nemegtosauridae by Wilson (2005) and Avilla et al. (2005); to Titanosauria by Apesteguía (2004) and Mannion and Calvo (2011); to Titanosauroidea by Gallina and Apesteguía (2011) and Gallina and Apesteguía (2015); to Lithostrotia by González Riga and Ortiz David (2014) and Páramo et al. (2020); and to Eutitanosauria by Carballido et al. (2017) and Navarro et al. (2022).
It was assigned to Nemegtosauridae by Wilson (2005) and Avilla et al. (2005); to Titanosauria by Apesteguía (2004) and Mannion and Calvo (2011); to Titanosauroidea by Gallina and Apesteguía (2011) and Gallina and Apesteguía (2015); to Lithostrotia by González Riga and Ortiz David (2014) and Páramo et al. (2020); and to Eutitanosauria by Carballido et al. (2017) and Navarro et al. (2022).
Species
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 2004 | Bonitasaura Apesteguía pp. 493-494 figs. 1-2 |
| 2005 | Bonitasaura Avilla et al. p. 43 |
| 2005 | Bonitasaura Wilson p. 313 |
| 2011 | Bonitasaura Gallina and Apesteguía |
| 2011 | Bonitasaura Mannion and Calvo |
| 2014 | Bonitasaura González Riga and Ortiz David |
| 2015 | Bonitasaura Gallina and Apesteguía p. 2 |
| 2017 | Bonitasaura Carballido et al. |
| 2020 | Bonitasaura Páramo et al. p. 373 |
| 2022 | Bonitasaura Navarro et al. p. 344 fig. 13 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available