Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Cunanax subradiata

Bivalvia - Carditida - Condylocardiidae

Taxonomy
Condylocardia subradiata was named by Tate (1889) [m. kosnik taxon no: 9075].

It was recombined as Cunanax subradiata by Middelfart (2002).

Sister species
Radiocondyla porrecta

View classification of included taxa

Synonyms
  • Condylocardia porrecta was named by Hedley (1906) [m. kosnik taxon no: 9076].

    It was synonymized subjectively with Cunanax subradiata by Middelfart (2002).
  • Radiocondyla ampla was named by Laseron (1953) [m. kosnik taxon no: 9077].

    It was synonymized subjectively with Cunanax subradiata by Middelfart (2002).
  • Radiocondyla rotunda was named by Laseron (1953) [m. kosnik taxon no: 9078].

    It was synonymized subjectively with Cunanax subradiata by Middelfart (2002).
Synonymy list
YearName and author
1889Condylocardia subradiata Tate
1906Condylocardia porrecta Hedley
1953Radiocondyla ampla Laseron
1953Radiocondyla rotunda Laseron
1998Condylocardia subradiata Lamprell and Healy p. 168
1998Condylocardia porrecta Lamprell and Healy p. 172
1998Radiocondyla ampla Lamprell and Healy p. 172
1998Radiocondyla rotunda Lamprell and Healy p. 172
2002Cunanax subradiata Middelfart p. 73

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Protostomia
Spiralia
Schizocoela
phylumMollusca
classBivalvia
Eubivalvia
subclassAutobranchia(Groblen 1894)
RankNameAuthor
infraclassHeteroconchia(Cox 1960)
CardiomorphiFerussac 1822
CarditioniDall 1889
orderCarditida(Dall 1889)
superfamilyCrassatelloidea(FĂ©russac 1822)
familyCondylocardiidaeBernard 1896
subfamilyCondylocardiinaeBernard 1896
genusCunanaxIredale 1936
speciessubradiata(Tate 1889)

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available