Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Raphitomidae
Taxonomy
Raphitomidae was named by Bellardi (1875). It is extant. Its type is Raphitoma.
It was assigned to Conoidea by Bouchet et al. (2011).
It was assigned to Conoidea by Bouchet et al. (2011).
Subtaxa
Abyssothauma, Andonia, Asperdaphne, Austrotoma, Buccinaria, Clinura, Daphnella, Eubela, Favriella, Lusitanops, Magnella, Maoridaphne, Metuonella, Mioawateria, Nepotilla, Phandella, Philbertia (syn. Peratotoma), Phymorhynchus, Pleurotomella, Puha, Raphitoma (type genus), Rimosodaphnella, Rugobela, Spergo, Teretia, Thatcheria, Thesbia, Typhlosyrinx, Xanthodaphne, Zenepos
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1863 | Daphnellinae Deshayes |
1875 | Raphitomidae Bellardi |
1928 | Daphnellinae Woodring p. 198 |
1960 | Daphnellinae MacNeil p. 117 |
1970 | Daphnellinae Woodring p. 402 |
1988 | Daphnellinae Ponder and Warén p. 307 |
1990 | Daphnellinae Beu et al. pp. 417, 420 |
1994 | Daphnellinae Wilson p. 183 |
2011 | Raphitomidae Bouchet et al. pp. 281 - 283 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Fm. Raphitomidae Bellardi 1875
show all | hide all
G. Asperdaphne
G. Daphnella Hinds 1844
+
†Daphnella bartschi Dall 1919
Daphnella clathrata Gabb 1865
†Daphnella defectiva Janse and Janssen 1983
Daphnella lymneiformis Woodring 1928
†Daphnella pagera Woodring 1970
G. Lusitanops Nordsieck 1968
G. †Philbertia Monterosato 1884
+
†Philbertia stonei Hertlein 1939
Invalid names: Peratotoma Harris and Burrows 1891 [synonym]
G. Phymorhynchus Dall 1908
G. Pleurotomella Verrill 1872
+
†Mangilia (Pleurotomella) bellistriata Clark 1895
Subg. †Pleurotomella (Pleurotomella) Verril 1872
Subg. †Pleurotomella (Systenope) Cossmann 1889
+
†Pleurotomella (Systenope) cossmanni Morellet and Morellet 1946
†Pleurotomella (Systenope) polycolpa Cossmann 1889
†Pleurotomella esmeralda Olsson 1964
†Pleurotomella rappardi Koenen 1867
G. Raphitoma Monterosato 1884
+
†Daphnella (Raphitoma) birmanica Vredenburg 1921
Subg. Raphitoma (Amblyacrum) Cossmann 1889
+
†Amblyacrum leptocolpa Cossmann 1889
†Raphitoma (Amblyacrum) perplexa Deshayes 1865
Subg. †Raphitoma (Raphitoma) Monterosato 1884
+
†Raphitoma (Raphitoma) costellata Lamarck 1804
+
†Raphitoma (Raphitoma) costellata bicristata Cossmann and Pissarro 1913
†Raphitoma (Raphitoma) costellata capellinii Deshayes 1865
†Raphitoma daphnelloides Gougerot and Le Renard 1981
†Raphitoma spinoreticulatum Gürs 2001
†Raphitoma submarginata Bellardi 1847
G. †Rimosodaphnella Cossmann 1915
G. Xanthodaphne Powell 1942
+
†Xanthodaphne campbellae Kiel 2006
Xanthodaphne pyrropelex Barnard 1963
Xanthodaphne subrosea Barnard 1963
Invalid names: Daphnellidae Deshayes 1863 [synonym]
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
P. Bouchet et al. 2011 | Shell very variable in shape and size, from buccinoid to ovate or to elongate-fusiform or high-cylindrical and from about 2 to over 140 mm high. Sculpture variously developed: from nearly smooth shell to well-developed spiral and axial elements, subsutural ramp, when separated from rest of the whorl, usually smooth or with traces of anal sinus growth. Apertural armature rarely well expressed, inner lip usually smooth. Anal sinus either subsutural, shaped as a ‘reversed-L’, or on subsutural ramp, asymmetric, very shallow to rather deep, typically not constrained but sometimes even almost tubular. Siphon short to rather long. Protoconch typically planktotrophic, multispiral, of 2.5–6.5 whorls, protoconch I often spirally striated, protoconch II with diagonally cancellated sculpture. There are many variations of the basic pattern of the protoconch II sculpture, though a combination of spiral and axial elements is retained, with the latter usually more pronounced, but protoconchs with a spiral keel and axial pillars (Fig. 23) depart from this pattern. Paucispiral protoconch with predominantly spiral striation. No operculum. |