| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Taxonomy
Omomyiformes was named as a suborder. It is not extant. Its type is Omomys. It was considered paraphyletic by Kay et al. (2004).
It was reranked as the unranked clade Omomyiformes by Burger (2010).
It was assigned to Haplorrhini by Kay et al. (2004); to Haplorhini by Williams and Kirk (2008); and to Tarsiiformes by Burger (2010).
It was reranked as the unranked clade Omomyiformes by Burger (2010).
It was assigned to Haplorrhini by Kay et al. (2004); to Haplorhini by Williams and Kirk (2008); and to Tarsiiformes by Burger (2010).
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 2004 | Omomyiformes Kay et al. p. 100 |
| 2008 | Omomyiformes Williams and Kirk p. 929 |
| 2010 | Omomyiformes Burger p. 14 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Unr. †Omomyiformes
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
| Source: o = order, subc = subclass, c = class, subp = subphylum | |||||
| References: Lillegraven 1979, Hendy et al. 2009, Nowak 1999, Carroll 1988, Ji et al. 2002 | |||||
Collections
No collection or age range data are available