Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Cabestana

Gastropoda - Ranellidae

Taxonomy
Cabestana was named by Röding (1798) [Sepkoski's age data: T Ol-u R Sepkoski's reference number: 909 Sepkoski's age data: T Ol-u R Sepkoski's reference number: 909; m. kosnik taxon no: 7954]. It is extant.

It was reranked as Cymatium (Cabestana) by Glibert (1963).

It was assigned to Cymatium by Glibert (1963); to Neotaenioglossa by Sepkoski (2002); and to Cymatiinae by Beu et al. (1990), Wilson (1993), Beu (2010) and Bouchet and Gofas (2011).

Species
Species lacking formal opinion data

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1798Cabestana Röding
1963Cymatium (Cabestana) Glibert p. 116
1990Cabestana Beu et al. p. 410
1993Cabestana Wilson p. 242
2002Cabestanna Sepkoski
2010Cabestana Beu p. 118
2011Cabestana Bouchet and Gofas

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Protostomia
Spiralia
superphylumLophotrochozoa
phylumMollusca
classGastropoda
RankNameAuthor
subclassCaenogastropoda(Cox 1959)
Sorbeoconcha(Ponder and Lindberg 1997)
Hypsogastropoda(Ponder and Lindberg 1997)
superorderLatrogastropodaRiedel 2000
superfamilyTonnoidea(Suter 1913)
familyRanellidaeGray 1854
subfamilyCymatiinaeIredale 1913
genusCabestanaRöding 1798

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

G. Cabestana Röding 1798
show all | hide all
Cabestana cutacea Linnaeus 1767
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
A. G. Beu 2010Cabestana is a distinctive genus of Ranellidae, with a shell somewhat resembling those of species of Monoplex, but with a narrow central radular tooth, not the conspicuously wide one of Cymatium and closely related genera, and with a short, smooth, turbiniform protoconch as in many species of Sassia, not the tall, multiwhorled, planktotrophic protoconch of Cymatium. Cabestana seems much more nearly related to Sassia than to Cymatium.