| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Ficopsis (Fulguroficus)
Taxonomy
Fulguroficus was named by Grabau (1904) [Sepkoski's age data: T Dani T Mi-l-u Sepkoski's reference number: 794,814,914].
It was reranked as Pyrula (Fulguroficus) by Scahffer (1912); it was reranked as Pirula (Fulguroficus) by Cossmann and Peyrot (1922); it was reranked as Ficus (Fulguroficus) by Koujumdgieva (1960); it was reranked as Ficopsis (Fulguroficus) by Harzhauser (2002), Harzhauser et al. (2002) and Mandic and Steininger (2003).
It was assigned to Pyrula by Scahffer (1912); to Pirula by Cossmann and Peyrot (1922); to Ficus by Koujumdgieva (1960); to Neotaenioglossa by Sepkoski (2002); and to Ficopsis by Harzhauser (2002), Harzhauser et al. (2002) and Mandic and Steininger (2003).
It was reranked as Pyrula (Fulguroficus) by Scahffer (1912); it was reranked as Pirula (Fulguroficus) by Cossmann and Peyrot (1922); it was reranked as Ficus (Fulguroficus) by Koujumdgieva (1960); it was reranked as Ficopsis (Fulguroficus) by Harzhauser (2002), Harzhauser et al. (2002) and Mandic and Steininger (2003).
It was assigned to Pyrula by Scahffer (1912); to Pirula by Cossmann and Peyrot (1922); to Ficus by Koujumdgieva (1960); to Neotaenioglossa by Sepkoski (2002); and to Ficopsis by Harzhauser (2002), Harzhauser et al. (2002) and Mandic and Steininger (2003).
Species lacking formal opinion data
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1904 | Fulguroficus Grabau |
| 1912 | Pyrula (Fulguroficus) Scahffer p. 139 |
| 1922 | Pirula (Fulguroficus) Cossmann and Peyrot p. 341 |
| 1960 | Ficus (Fulguroficus) Koujumdgieva p. 133 |
| 2002 | Ficopsis (Fulguroficus) Harzhauser p. 91 |
| 2002 | Ficopsis (Fulguroficus) Harzhauser et al. |
| 2002 | Fulguroficus Sepkoski |
| 2003 | Ficopsis (Fulguroficus) Mandic and Steininger p. 272 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Subg. †Ficopsis (Fulguroficus) Grabau 1904
show all | hide all
†Ficopsis (Fulguroficus) burdigalensis Sowerby 1824
†Fulguroficus hoffstetteri Etayo-Serna 1979
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available