Where: Antarctica (64.2° S, 56.6° W)
• Paleocoordinates: 62.6° S, 66.3° W (Wright 2013)
• coordinate stated in text
• outcrop-level geographic resolution
When: Telm 5 Member (La Meseta Formation), Bartonian (41.0 - 37.7 Ma)
• From the lowest part of Telm5 or the Cucullaea I allomember. The age model for the La Meseta Formation (and recently-defined Submeseta Formation) is controversial. Strontium isotopes (Ivany et al., 2008) suggest earlier ages, with the La Meseta (Telm1-Telm5) almost entirely Ypresian and the Submeseta (Telm6-Telm7) Middle-Late Eocene. Montes et al. (2013) also created an age model incorporating magnetostratigraphy to support the largely-Ypresian age for the La Meseta and Middle-Late Eocene for the Submeseta. Some mammals are similar to the radiometrically-constrained late early Eocene Paso del Sapo assemblage of Patagonia (Gelfo et al., 2009, Tejedor et al., 2009), but the mammals are not exactly similar (Bond et al., 2011). However, Douglas et al. (2014) re-evaluated the strontium data and used dinoflagellate biostratigraphy to argue for a Lutetian (Telm2-4) and younger (Bartonian to mid-Priabonian for Telm5-6) age range. Amenábar et al. (2020) also found younger ages from dinoflagellates: Lutetian (Telm1-mid Telm 3), Bartonian (mid Telm 3-mid Telm 5), and Priabonian (upper Telm 5), SPDZ10-SPDZ13. This age range is more consistent with the presence of basilosaurid whales in Telm4 and Telm7, as basilosaurids are globally-distributed first in the middle Eocene (Buono et al., 2016). Although the ages are still debated, the dinoflagellate age model of Amenábar et al. (2020) is used here.
• group of beds-level stratigraphic resolution
Environment/lithology: paralic; burrowed, silty sandstone and poorly lithified, concretionary, shelly/skeletal sandstone
Size classes: macrofossils, mesofossils
Collection methods: sieve,
• Repository: University of California, Riverside
Primary reference: M. O. Woodburne and W. J. Zinmeister. 1982. Fossil Land Mammal from Antarctica. Science 218:284-286 [J. Alroy/E. Leckey/E. Leckey]more details
Purpose of describing collection: taxonomic analysis
PaleoDB collection 31173: authorized by John Alroy, entered by Erin Leckey on 15.04.2003, edited by Mark Uhen and Matthew Clapham
Creative Commons license: CC0 (CC0)
Taxonomic list
| Cephalopoda | |
"Eutrephoceras argentinae" = Euciphoceras argentinae12
"Eutrephoceras argentinae" = Euciphoceras argentinae12 Del Valle and Fourcade 1976 | |
|
Aturia sp.12 Bronn 1838 | |
| Reptilia | |
|
Reptilia indet. Laurenti 1768 reptile | |
"Chelonia indet." = Testudines
"Chelonia indet." = Testudines Batsch 1788 turtle | |
| Aves | |
|
Aves indet. Linnaeus 1758 bird | |
|
| |
| Mammalia | |
|
Metatheria indet. Huxley 1880 metatherian | |
Antarctodolops sp.2, "Antarctodolops dailyi n. gen. n. sp." = Antarctodolops dailyi11, "Eurydolops seymourensis n. gen. n. sp." = Antarctodolops dailyi1
Antarctodolops sp.2 Woodburne and Zinsmeister 1984 metatherian UCR 20913, an isolated left M2. Could be _A. dailyi_, _A. mesetaense_, or a third species.
| |
|
| |
| Osteichthyes | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Chondrichthyes | |
|
| |
"Carcharocles auriculatus" = Otodus auriculatus7
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Angiospermae | |
|
| |