Cucullaea beds, Telm 2/3, Seymour Island (Eocene of Antarctica)

Where: Antarctica (64.2° S, 56.7° W: paleocoordinates 63.7° S, 61.5° W)

• coordinate estimated from map

When: La Meseta Formation, Lutetian (47.8 - 41.3 Ma)

• The age model for the La Meseta Formation (and recently-defined Submeseta Formation) is controversial. Strontium isotopes (Ivany et al., 2008) suggest earlier ages, with the La Meseta (Telm1-Telm5) almost entirely Ypresian and the Submeseta (Telm6-Telm7) Middle-Late Eocene. Montes et al. (2013) also created an age model incorporating magnetostratigraphy to support the largely-Ypresian age for the La Meseta and Middle-Late Eocene for the Submeseta. Some mammals are similar to the radiometrically-constrained late early Eocene Paso del Sapo assemblage of Patagonia (Gelfo et al., 2009, Tejedor et al., 2009), but the mammals are not exactly similar (Bond et al., 2011). However, Douglas et al. (2014) re-evaluated the strontium data and used dinoflagellate biostratigraphy to argue for a Lutetian (Telm2-4) and younger (Bartonian to mid-Priabonian for Telm5-6) age range. AmenĂ¡bar et al. (2019) also found younger ages from dinoflagellates: Lutetian (Telm1-mid Telm 3), Bartonian (mid Telm 3-mid Telm 5), and Priabonian (upper Telm 5), SPDZ10-SPDZ13. This age range is more consistent with the presence of basilosaurid whales in Telm4 and Telm7, as basilosaurids are globally-distributed first in the middle Eocene (Buono et al., 2016). Although the ages are still debated, the dinoflagellate age model of AmenĂ¡bar et al. (2019) is used here.

• group of beds-level stratigraphic resolution

Environment/lithology: prodelta; unlithified sandstone

• According to Stilwell & Zinsmeister (1992), "Telm2 strata are typically very fine grained. These strata were deposited below wave base or in a protected embayment as shown by the lack of current ripples, scour features, or evidence of reworking. Localized shell banks with a bioclastic fabric indicate occasional higher current energy and some distance of transport, although the distance of transport was minimal. The presence of local slump structures indicates that deposition of Telm2 may have occurred on a sloping unstable surface." These characteristics suggest a prodelta is the best interpretation.

Size class: macrofossils

Collected by Gazdzicki

• Repository: Institute of Paleobiology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Primary reference: J. Dzik and A. Gazdzicki. 2001. The Eocene expansion of nautilids to high latitudes. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 172:297-312 [M. Clapham/K. Okamoto/M. Clapham]more details

Purpose of describing collection: general faunal/floral analysis

PaleoDB collection 173111: authorized by Matthew Clapham, entered by Kristina Okamoto on 09.09.2015, edited by Mark Uhen

Creative Commons license: CC BY (attribution)

Taxonomic list

Cephalopoda
 Nautilida - Nautilidae
Euciphoceras argentinae Del Valle and Fourcade 1976
Malacostraca
 Decapoda - Callianassidae
Protocallianassa faujasi Desmarest 1822 decapod
 Decapoda - Corystidae
"? Micromithrax minisculus" = Corystes minisculus
"? Micromithrax minisculus" = Corystes minisculus Feldmann and Wilson 1988 crab
 Decapoda - Munidopsidae
Munidopsis scabrosa Feldmann and Wilson 1988 decapod