Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Sinornis santensis

Reptilia

Taxonomy
Sinornis santensis was named by Sereno and Rao (1992). Its type specimen is BPV 538a+b, a skeleton (mostly complete skeleton with a partial skull), and it is a compression fossil. Its type locality is Sinornis type locality, which is in an Aptian lacustrine siliciclastic in the Jiufotang Formation of China.

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1992Sinornis santensis Sereno and Rao p. 848
1999Sinornis santensis Wang et al. p. 3
2002Sinornis santensis Chiappe p. 462
2004Sinornis santensis Senter et al. p. 3
2010Sinornis santensis O'Connor and Dyke p. 16

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
Sauropsida
classReptilia
subclassEureptilia()
Romeriida
Diapsida()
RankNameAuthor
Archosauromorpha(Huene 1946)
Crocopoda
ArchosauriformesGauthier 1986
Eucrocopoda
Archosauria()
informalAvemetatarsalia
Ornithodira
Dinosauromorpha
Dinosauriformes
Dinosauria()
Theropoda()
Neotheropoda
AverostraPaul 2002
Tetanurae
Coelurosauria()
Maniraptora
Avialae
Ornithothoraces
subclassEnantiornithes
genusSinornis
speciessantensis

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Sinornis santensis Sereno and Rao 1992
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
J. O'Connor and G. Dyke 2010Sinornis santensis (BNHM BPV 538) differs from C.
yandica (IVPP V9769) in that: (1) the first phalanx of the minor digit is curved (cf. straight in C. yandica) and proportionately longer relative to the first phalanx of the major digit; (2) the claw of the major digit is proportionately larger relative to that of the alular digit; (3) the postacetabular wing of the ilium is proximally broad, curved and tapered distally (cf. ‘strap-like’ in C. yandica); (4) the ulnare is U-shaped with a relatively deep narrow incisure (wide and shallow incisure in C. yandica) and; (5) the pygostyle is shorter (3⁄4 the length of that of C. yandica).