Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Taxonomy
Cete was named by Linnaeus (1758). It is extant.
It was reranked as the family Cete by Illiger (1811); it was reranked as the suborder Cete by Gray (1863), Gray (1864), Gray (1866); it was reranked as the unranked clade Cete by McKenna (1975); it was misspelled as Cetae by Gray (1825), Gray (1850), Bonaparte (1850), Gill (1872), Hay (1902), Hay (1930), Archibald (1998), Hulbert and Whitmore (2006).
It was assigned to Natantia by Illiger (1811); to Pinnata by Bonaparte (1850); to Cetacea by Gray (1863), Gray (1864), Gray (1866); to Educabilia by Gill (1872); to Monodelphia by Hay (1902); to Monodelphia by Hay (1930); to Ungulata by McKenna (1975); to Cetungulata by Archibald (1998); and to Mammalia by Linnaeus (1758), Gray (1825), Gray (1850), Hulbert and Whitmore (2006).
It was reranked as the family Cete by Illiger (1811); it was reranked as the suborder Cete by Gray (1863), Gray (1864), Gray (1866); it was reranked as the unranked clade Cete by McKenna (1975); it was misspelled as Cetae by Gray (1825), Gray (1850), Bonaparte (1850), Gill (1872), Hay (1902), Hay (1930), Archibald (1998), Hulbert and Whitmore (2006).
It was assigned to Natantia by Illiger (1811); to Pinnata by Bonaparte (1850); to Cetacea by Gray (1863), Gray (1864), Gray (1866); to Educabilia by Gill (1872); to Monodelphia by Hay (1902); to Monodelphia by Hay (1930); to Ungulata by McKenna (1975); to Cetungulata by Archibald (1998); and to Mammalia by Linnaeus (1758), Gray (1825), Gray (1850), Hulbert and Whitmore (2006).
Subtaxa
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1758 | Cete Linnaeus p. 75 |
1811 | Cete Illiger p. 141 |
1825 | Cetae Gray p. 340 |
1850 | Cete Bonaparte p. 1 |
1850 | Cete Gray p. 1 |
1863 | Cete Gray p. 198 |
1864 | Cete Gray p. 198 |
1866 | Cete Gray p. 62 |
1872 | Cete Gill p. v |
1902 | Cete Hay p. 585 |
1930 | Cete Hay p. 656 |
1975 | Cete McKenna p. 43 |
1998 | Cete Archibald p. 299 |
2006 | Cete Hulbert and Whitmore p. 19 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Or. Cete Linnaeus 1758
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available