Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Culicolestes kielanae

Osteichthyes

Taxonomy
Culicolestes kielanae was named by Cifelli et al. (2016). Its type specimen is OMNH 25809, a tooth (left upper molar missing the distal stylar shelf and some cusp apices), and it is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is OMNH V239, Mussentuchit, which is in a Cenomanian channel horizon in the Cedar Mountain Formation of Utah. It is the type species of Culicolestes.

Synonymy list
YearName and author
2016Culicolestes kielanae Cifelli et al. p. 73–74 fig. 5

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
classOsteichthyes
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
RankNameAuthor
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
classMammalia
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
genusCulicolestes
specieskielanae

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Culicolestes kielanae Cifelli et al. 2016
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
R. L. Cifelli et al. 2016 Most similar to Dakotadens among comparable taxa, differing in: larger size; upper molars with preparacrista extending mesially, toward the parastyle (rather than buccally, toward the stylocone, as in Dakotadens and most other basal tribosphenidans); conules and internal cristae more distinct (presumed apomorphies); paracone and metacone share a common base; trigon basin not as deep; stylar shelf wider (mesially, at least). Lower molars are larger than and distinct from those of Dakotadens in having a strong, cusp-like f (developed as a narrow ridge in Dakotadens), a strong e cusp (weak or absent in Dakotadens), and a greater trigonid/talonid height differential.