| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Taxonomy
Venus vetula was named by Basterot (1825).
It was recombined as Tapes vetulus by Henriques da Silva (1956); it was recombined as Paphia vetula by Dominici et al. (2020).
It was recombined as Tapes vetulus by Henriques da Silva (1956); it was recombined as Paphia vetula by Dominici et al. (2020).
Sister species lacking formal opinion data
P. aurabilis, P. aurea, P. benoisti, P. declivis, P. deshayesii, P. euglypta, P. hirabayashii, P. peruana, P. pseudolirata, P. pullastra, P. rhomboides, P. schnelliana, P. senescens, P. staminea, P. subcarinata, P. suzuensis, P. takanabensis, P. taurellipicta, P. taurelliptica, P. vernicosa, P. landersi, P. neglecta, P. benoisti, P. crassisulca, P. kamtschatica, P. liratus, P. waldmanni, P. naganumana, P. ohiroi, P. rotundatus, P. vernicosa, P. neglecta, P. undulata, P. gallus, P. sinuosa, P. philippinarum
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1825 | Venus vetula Basterot |
| 1956 | Tapes vetulus Henriques da Silva p. 35 figs. Pl 4, figs 1-3 |
| 2020 | Paphia vetula Dominici et al. |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Paphia vetula Basterot 1825
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available