| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Archaeohippus minimus
Taxonomy
Anchitherium minimus was named by Douglass (1899) [also said to be 1900]. It is a 3D body fossil.
It was recombined as Parahippus minimus by Osborn (1918); it was synonymized subjectively with Archaeohippus ultimus by Downs (1956), Dingus (1990); it was considered a nomen dubium by Macdonald (1992); it was recombined as Archaeohippus minimus by Schlaikjer (1937), Stirton (1940), Storer (1975), MacFadden (1998), Tabrum and Nichols (2001).
It was recombined as Parahippus minimus by Osborn (1918); it was synonymized subjectively with Archaeohippus ultimus by Downs (1956), Dingus (1990); it was considered a nomen dubium by Macdonald (1992); it was recombined as Archaeohippus minimus by Schlaikjer (1937), Stirton (1940), Storer (1975), MacFadden (1998), Tabrum and Nichols (2001).
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1899 | Achitherium minimus Douglass p. 26 |
| 1899 | Anchitherium minimus Douglass p. 26 |
| 1918 | Parahippus minimus Osborn p. 96 figs. Text Fig. 72a |
| 1937 | Archaeohippus minimus Schlaikjer |
| 1940 | Archaeohippus minimus Stirton p. 176 |
| 1975 | Archaeohippus minimus Storer p. 45 |
| 1998 | Archaeohippus minimus MacFadden p. 546 |
| 2001 | Archaeohippus minimus Tabrum and Nichols |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Archaeohippus minimus Douglass 1899
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
| Reference | Diagnosis | |
|---|---|---|
| H. F. Osborn 1918 | (Douglass, 1899, pp. 26, 27) Type. (1) I use Anchitherium in the restricted sense in which Scott has
used it, the Madison species being, so far as I know, the second found in America. (2) It is much smaller than A. aurelianense Cuv. or A. equinum Scott. It differs from A. equinum in the following respects: (3) in p3 cross crests united by an isthmus across the median valley, thus forming two enamel lakes, as in modern horses; in p4 protoloph does not reach outer wall of crown; (5) posterior pillar proportionately larger than in Scott's specimen; (6) a small pillar at the entrance of the median valley in p3; (7) in m1 median transverse cross crest more sigmoid than in A. equinum; (8) posterior pillar connectedwithhypocone,withasingleenamelloupextendingoutward; (9)outercrescentswithratherfaintmedianridges. Paratype lower jaw: (1) incisors nearly uniform in size, semi-procumbent; (2) no diastema between incisors and canine; (3) post-canine diastema much longer than in A. equinum; (4) symphysis very long. |