Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Rhodopagus guoi

Osteichthyes - Perissodactyla - Hyracodontidae

Taxonomy
Rhodopagus guoi was named by Paepen et al. (2021). Its type specimen is IMM-1995-BAYU-0, a mandible (, right dentary with m2-m3, roots of p2-m1 and symphysis, and left dentary fragment with p4-m2 and roots of p2-3), and it is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is Arshantan Bayan Ulan locality, which is in an Eocene terrestrial horizon in the Arshanto Formation of China.

Synonymy list
YearName and author
2021Rhodopagus guoi Paepen et al. p. 184 figs. 7-9

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
classOsteichthyes
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
RankNameAuthor
Mammaliaformes
classMammalia
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Placentalia
Boreoeutheria
Laurasiatheria
Scrotifera
Euungulata
Panperissodactyla
superorderPerissodactylamorpha
orderPerissodactyla()
Tapiromorpha(Haeckel 1873)
Ceratomorpha(Wood 1937)
superfamilyRhinocerotoidea
familyHyracodontidaeCope 1879
genusRhodopagusRadinsky 1965
speciesguoi

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Rhodopagus guoi Paepen et al. 2021
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
M. Paepen et al. 2021Species of Rhodopagus which is larger in size com-
pared to Rhodopagus minimus, Rhodopagus radinskyi, and Yimengia
zdanskyi; differs from Yimengia by the presence of p3-4 entoconids
and a non-molariform P4 which bears a continuous, ‘‘V”-shaped
protoloph-metaloph loop; p2-3 protolophids are shorter compared
to Yimengia yani; differs from Y. zdanskyi by the near equal height
of the m2-3 protolophids and hypolophids; unlike R. minimus and
R. radinskyi, the distinct cristid obliqua of lower premolars and
molars contact the protolophid lingual to the protoconid; the lower
molars do not exhibit swollen root tips as R. minimus.