Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Galinhapodus gomesi
Taxonomy
Polyonyx gomesi was named by Santos et al. (2009). It is considered to be a form taxon. Its type specimen is MNDPDSA, a footprint, and it is a trace fossil. Its type locality is Pedreira do Galinha tracksite, which is in a Bathonian shallow subtidal limestone/wackestone in the Serra de Aire Formation of Portugal. It is the type species of Polyonyx.
It was recombined as Galinhapodus gomesi by dos Santos et al. (2024).
It was recombined as Galinhapodus gomesi by dos Santos et al. (2024).
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
2009 | Polyonyx gomesi Santos et al. |
2013 | Polyonyx gomesi Castanera et al. p. 15 |
2013 | Polyonyx gomesi Xing et al. p. 122 |
2015 | Polyonyx gomesi Torcida Fernández-Baldor et al. p. 149 |
2015 | Polyonyx gomesi Xing et al. p. 358 |
2016 | Polyonyx gomesi Salisbury et al. p. 50 |
2016 | Polyonyx gomesi Santos p. 57 |
2017 | Polyonyx gomesi Mazin et al. p. 290 |
2018 | Polyonyx gomesi Xing et al. p. 593 |
2020 | Polyonyx gomesi Moreau et al. p. 9 |
2021 | Polyonyx gomesi Poropat et al. p. 30 |
2022 | Polyonyx gomesi Tomaselli et al. p. 10 |
2024 | Galinhapodus gomesi dos Santos et al. p. 588 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Galinhapodus gomesi Santos et al. 2009
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
V. F. dos Santos et al. 2024 | Wide gauge sauropod trackway revealing low heteropody (manus−pes area ratio 1:2) and two autapomorphies: (1) asymmetric manus prints with large digit I marks oriented in a medial direction with a large, posteriorly oriented, triangular claw mark, and impressions of digits II–V; (2) pes prints with four claw marks: claws I–II with an anterior orientation, and III–IV laterally oriented. Manus digits II–V show a slightly bent arrangement (Santos et al. 2009). |