Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Australodelphis
Taxonomy
Australodelphis was named by Fordyce et al. (2002). It is not extant. Its type is Australodelphis mirus. It was considered monophyletic by Murakami et al. (2014).
It was assigned to Delphinidae by Fordyce et al. (2002), Murakami et al. (2014), Marx et al. (2016) and Berta (2017).
It was assigned to Delphinidae by Fordyce et al. (2002), Murakami et al. (2014), Marx et al. (2016) and Berta (2017).
Species
A. mirus (type species)
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
2002 | Australodelphis Fordyce et al. pp. 40-49 figs. 2-5 |
2014 | Australodelphis Murakami et al. p. 492 figs. Table 1 |
2016 | Australodelphis Marx et al. p. 140 |
2017 | Australodelphis Berta p. 164 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
G. †Australodelphis Fordyce et al. 2002
show all | hide all
†Australodelphis mirus Fordyce et al. 2002
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available