| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Grallator olonensis
Taxonomy
Grallator olonensis was named by Lapparent and Montenat (1967). It is considered to be a form taxon. Its type specimen is ULB-04D19_A1 to ULB-04D19_A13 (syntypes), a footprint, and it is a trace fossil. Its type locality is Pointe du Veillon tracksite, F1, which is in a Rhaetian estuary/bay limestone in France.
Sister species lacking formal opinion data
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1967 | Grallator olonensis Lapparent and Montenat p. 14 fig. 6 |
| 1968 | Grallator olonensis Courel et al. p. 277 |
| 1971 | Grallator oloensis Haubold p. 67 |
| 1972 | Grallator olonensis Demathieu and Haubold p. 806 |
| 1974 | Grallator oloensis Haubold p. 119 |
| 1994 | Grallator olonensis Vignaud et al. p. 497 |
| 2000 | Grallator olonensis Gand et al. p. 617 |
| 2002 | Grallator olonensis Montenat and Bessonnat p. 348 |
| 2003 | Grallator olonensis Demathieu p. 59 |
| 2003 | Grallator olonensis Montenat and Bessonnat p. 42 |
| 2003 | Grallator olonensis Viaud and Duclous p. 4 |
| 2005 | Grallator olonensis Clark et al. p. 98 |
| 2019 | Grallator olonensis Moreau et al. p. 349 |
| 2021 | Grallator olonensis Leonardi and Carvalho p. 111 |
| 2024 | Grallator olonensis Moreau et al. p. 347–349 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Grallator olonensis Lapparent and Montenat 1967
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
| Reference | Diagnosis | |
|---|---|---|
| J. Moreau et al. 2024 | Tridactyl, very small-sized tracks (L = 3-5 cm), longer than wide and with a long projection of the trace of digit III (L/D = 2.1 in average). L/W ratio quite variable (1.2-2.5). Well-defined, very thin, elongated and often separated impressions of digits. Impression of digit III longer than traces of digits II and IV. Trace of digit III often curved distally. Traces of digits III and IV quite similar in length. Bases of digits II and IV proximally located at the same height. Variable but low divarication angle II-IV (35° in average). Tiny, oval and well-marked phalangeal pads. Tiny marks of acuminate claws. |