Euspira jhuraensis n. sp. fromthe Oxfordian horizons of Kutch has a large-sized shell, whereas E. lakhaparensis n. sp. has a medium-sized shell and comes from the younger Tithonian bed. In E. jhuraensis n. sp., the spire is very low and consists of two whorls, whereas in E. lakhaparensis n. sp., the spire is slightly elevated and consists of three whorls. These two species also differ in growth line patterns: E. jhuraensis n. sp. has orthocline growth lines, but they are slightly prosocline to straight in E. lakhaparensis n. sp.

Euspira lakhaparensis n. sp. closely resembles E. rectilabrum (Conrad, 1858) from the lower Maastrichtian of the Mexcala Formation, Mexico (Perrilliat et al., 2000; p. 14, fig. 6.9, 6.10) in having a globose shell and impressed suture. But E. rectilabrum has a moderately thick shell and larger number of whorls in the teleoconch. These two species also differ in shell size and growth lines patterns: E. lakhaparensis n. sp. has a medium-sized shell and slightly prosocline-to-straight growth lines, whereas in E. rectilabrum, the shell is small and growth-line pattern is prosocline.

Euspira lakhaparensis was named by Das et al. (2019) [Etymology.—The species name refers to Lakhapar village of Kutch, western India, from where the species has been collected.]. Its type specimen is Holotype specimen (ISI/g/Jur/N 99). and is a 3D body fossil.