| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Sebastes rosae
Taxonomy
Sebastodes rosae was named by Eigenmann (1900) [year is a guess].
It was recombined as Sebastes rosae by Fierstine et al. (2012).
It was recombined as Sebastes rosae by Fierstine et al. (2012).
Sister species lacking formal opinion data
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1900 | Sebastodes rosae Eigenmann |
| 1902 | Sebastodes rosae Hay p. 406 |
| 1907 | Sebastodes rosae Jordan p. 134 |
| 2012 | Sebastes rosae Fierstine et al. p. 104 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Sebastes rosae Eigenmann 1900
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Source: o = order, subp = subphylum | |||||
| References: Hendy et al. 2009, Kiessling 2004, Carroll 1988 | |||||