| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Novapes
Taxonomy
Novapes was named by Lee et al. (2020). It is considered to be a form taxon. Its type is Novapes ulsanensis.
It was assigned to Choristodera by Lee et al. (2020).
It was assigned to Choristodera by Lee et al. (2020).
Species
N. ulsanensis (type species)
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 2020 | Novapes Lee et al. p. 1 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
| Reference | Diagnosis | |
|---|---|---|
| Y.-N. Lee et al. 2020 | Quadrupedal tracks with a pronounced heteropody; pentadactyl manus impression with claw marks and semi-symmetrical outline, wider than longer; divergence between digit I and V imprints ranges 180° to 210°; the digit IV imprint slightly longer than digit II; entaxonic; pentadactyl pes impression with claw marks and asymmetrical outline (i.e., lateral digits are more developed), longer than wide; webbing between the proximal portion of slender digits; the subequal digits III and IV imprints longer than others (the digit I imprint only 30% in length of the digit IV imprint); the sole pad impression is elongate with a U-shaped “heel”; entaxonic. |
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Source: subc = subclass, c = class, subp = subphylum | |||||
| References: Kiessling 2004, Carroll 1988, Hendy et al. 2009 | |||||