| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Beipiaosaurus
Taxonomy
Beipiaosaurus was named by Xu et al. (1999). Its type is Beipiaosaurus inexpectus.
It was assigned to Therizinosauroidea by Xu et al. (1999), Xu et al. (2002), Ruiz-Omeñaca and Canudo (2003), Currie (2003), Rauhut (2003), Clark et al. (2004), Kirkland et al. (2004), Zanno (2004), Zanno (2006), Ji et al. (2007), Li et al. (2007), Li et al. (2008), Li (2008), Xu et al. (2009), Zanno (2010), Zanno (2010), Xing et al. (2012), Pu et al. (2013), Liao and Xu (2019).
It was assigned to Therizinosauroidea by Xu et al. (1999), Xu et al. (2002), Ruiz-Omeñaca and Canudo (2003), Currie (2003), Rauhut (2003), Clark et al. (2004), Kirkland et al. (2004), Zanno (2004), Zanno (2006), Ji et al. (2007), Li et al. (2007), Li et al. (2008), Li (2008), Xu et al. (2009), Zanno (2010), Zanno (2010), Xing et al. (2012), Pu et al. (2013), Liao and Xu (2019).
Species
B. inexpectus (type species)
Entered
by M. Carrano on 2005-10-24; modified by M. Carrano on 2022-03-23
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1999 | Beipiaosaurus Xu et al. p. 351 |
| 2002 | Beipiaosaurus Xu et al. p. 239 |
| 2003 | Beipiaosaurus Currie p. 57 |
| 2003 | Beipiaosaurus Rauhut p. 41 |
| 2003 | Beipiaosaurus Ruiz-Omeñaca and Canudo p. 295 |
| 2004 | Beipiaosaurus Clark et al. p. 152 |
| 2004 | Beipiaosaurus Kirkland et al. p. 78A |
| 2004 | Beipiaosaurus Zanno p. 134A |
| 2006 | Beipiaosaurus Zanno p. 648 |
| 2007 | Beipiaosaurus Ji et al. p. 13 |
| 2007 | Beipiaosaurus Li et al. pp. 546-547 fig. 4 |
| 2008 | Beipiaosaurus Li p. 47 |
| 2008 | Beipiaosaurus Li et al. pp. 778-779 |
| 2009 | Beipiaosaurus Xu et al. p. 832 |
| 2010 | Beipiaosaurus Zanno p. 225 |
| 2012 | Beipiaosaurus Xing et al. p. 503 |
| 2013 | Beipiaosaurus Pu et al. |
| 2019 | Beipiaosaurus Liao and Xu p. 118 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available