| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Pristis lathami
Taxonomy
Pristis lathami was named by Galeotti (1837).
Sister species lacking formal opinion data
Entered
by M. Uhen on 2007-05-23
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1836 | Pristis bisulcatus Agassiz figs. Pl 41, figs 1-4 |
| 1837 | Pristis lathami Galeotti |
| 1843 | Pristis bisulcatus Agassiz p. 382 |
| 1852 | Pristis parisiensis Gervais |
| 1889 | Pristis bisulcatus Woodward p. 73 |
| 1926 | Pristis lathami White p. 50 |
| 1943 | Pristis lathami Dartevelle and Casier p. 171 figs. Pl 14, figs 21,22 |
| 1946 | Pristis lathami Casier p. 97 |
| 1971 | Pristis lathami Casier p. 4 figs. Pl, fig 10 |
| 1972 | Pristis lathami Nolf p. 116 figs. Pl 1, fig 7 |
| 1981 | Pristis lathami Case p. 70 |
| 1987 | Pristis lathami Cappetta p. 160 |
| 1988 | Pristis lathami Nolf p. 136 figs. Pl 40, fig 1 |
| 2007 | Pristis lathami Cicimurri p. 597 |
| 2016 | Pristis lathami Cappetta and Case p. 63 figs. Pl 11, figs 1,2 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Pristis lathami Galeotti 1837
show all | hide all
Invalid names: Pristis bisulcatus Agassiz 1836 [synonym], Pristis parisiensis Gervais 1852 [synonym]
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available