Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Mirandornithes (disused)

Reptilia

Taxonomy
Mirandornithes was named by Sangster (2005). It is extant.

It was assigned to Aves by Sangster (2005); and to Aequorlitornithes by Prum et al. (2015).

Synonymy list
YearName and author
2005Mirandornithes Sangster p. 612
2015Mirandornithes Prum et al.

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
Sauropsida
classReptilia
subclassEureptilia()
Romeriida
RankNameAuthor
Diapsida()
Archosauromorpha(Huene 1946)
Crocopoda
ArchosauriformesGauthier 1986
Eucrocopoda
Archosauria()
informalAvemetatarsalia
Ornithodira
Dinosauromorpha
Dinosauriformes
Dinosauria()
Theropoda()
Neotheropoda
AverostraPaul 2002
Tetanurae
Coelurosauria()
Maniraptora
Paraves
classAves
Mirandornithes
Mirandornithes

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Unr. Mirandornithes Sangster 2005
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
G. Sangster 2005The name Mirandornithes refers to the least inclusive clade comprising Phoenicopterus ruber Linnaeus, 1758 and Podiceps cristatus (Linnaeus, 1758). Phoenicopterus ruber and Podiceps cristatus are selected as reference taxa because these are the type species of Phoenicopterus and Podiceps, respectively, on which the names Phoenicopteridae and Podicipedidae, respectively, are based. A node- rather than a stem-based definition of Mirandornithes is selected because its sister-taxon is unresolved (see below), as recom- mended by Sereno (1999).