| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Citipati osmolskae
Taxonomy
Citipati osmolskae was named by Clark et al. (2001). Its type specimen is IGM 100/978, a skull, and it is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is Ankylosaur Flats, Ukhaa Tolgod, which is in a Campanian eolian sandstone in the Djadokhta Formation of Mongolia. It is the type species of Citipati.
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 2001 | Citipati osmolskae Clark et al. pp. 209-211 figs. fig. 1. |
| 2003 | Citipati osmolskae Rauhut p. 40 |
| 2004 | Citipati osmolskae Lü et al. p. 109 fig. 8 |
| 2004 | Citipati osmolskae Osmólska et al. p. 167 |
| 2005 | Citipati osmolskae Buffetaut et al. p. 480 |
| 2005 | Citipati osmolskae Lü p. 140 |
| 2007 | Citipati osmolskae Turner et al. p. 18 fig. 10 |
| 2009 | Citipati osmolskae Balanoff et al. p. 11 |
| 2010 | Citipati osmolskae Longrich et al. p. 953 fig. 7 |
| 2010 | Citipati osmolskae Xu and Han p. 12 |
| 2011 | Citipati osmolskae Turner et al. p. 38 |
| 2012 | Citipati osmolskae Fanti et al. p. 7 |
| 2013 | Citipati osmolskae Poropat and Kear p. 111 |
| 2014 | Citipati osmolskae Lamanna et al. p. 10 fig. 6 |
| 2015 | Citipati osmolskae Funston et al. p. 186 |
| 2016 | Citipati osmolskae Funston and Currie p. 5 |
| 2016 | Citipati osmolskae Lee p. 1 |
| 2016 | Citipati osmolskae Wang et al. p. 6 |
| 2018 | Citipati osmolskae Norell et al. p. 2 |
| 2019 | Citipati osmolskae Simon et al. p. 2 |
| 2020 | Citipati osmolskae Funston p. 136 fig. 20 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Citipati osmolskae Clark et al. 2001
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available