Seymour Island, locality 4: Ypresian, Antarctica
collected by Prof. Andrzej Gazdzicki 1988

List of taxa
Where & when
Geology
Taphonomy & methods
Metadata & references
Taxonomic list
Rhynchonellata - Terebratulida - Terebratellidae
Terebratella sp. d'Orbigny 1847
2 specimens
see common names

Geography
Country:Antarctica
Coordinates: 64.2° South, 56.7° West (view map)
Paleocoordinates:63.4° South, 63.8° West
Basis of coordinate:estimated from map
Geographic resolution:outcrop
Time
Period: Paleogene Epoch: Eocene
Stage: Ypresian 10 m.y. bin: Cenozoic 2
Key time interval: Ypresian
Age range of interval: 56 - 47.8 m.y. ago
Stratigraphy
Geological group:Seymour Island Formation:La Meseta
Stratigraphic resolution:group of beds
Stratigraphy comments: Unit II of the La Meseta Formation (Elliot and Trautman 1982)
Lithology and environment
Primary lithology:massive,lenticular,deformed bedding,bioturbation,pebbly unlithified silty sandstone
Secondary lithology:massive,lenticular,deformed bedding,bioturbation,pebbly unlithified muddy siltstone
Includes fossils?Y
Includes fossils?Y
Lithology description: The La Meseta Formation is an upward-coarsening sequence of unconsolidated fine-grained sands, silts, and muds. Unit II, 89 meters thick, is lithologically similar to unit I but also contains both lenticular bodies of unconsolidated massive sand and consolidated sand beds with both pebbles and Cucullea bivalves. Soft sediment slumping and folding are observed within unit II. (Pezzetti and Krissek 1986)
Environment:delta front
Geology comments: The La Meseta Formation is interpreted as a relatively shallow water deposit, based on both fossil content and sedimentary structures. Elliot and Trautman (1982) originally proposed that the La Meseta was deposited as a prograding tidally dominated delta, with unit I representing the prodelta, unit II the deltafront, and unit III the lagoonal (or delta-plain) sequence. Although Woodburne and Zinsmeister (1984) interpreted accumulations of arthropods, mammal teeth, whale and penguin bones, and other fossil remains in unit II as beach deposits,sedimentary structures in unit II do not indicate an active beach-front environment. Our data suggest that a deltaic environment provides one reasonable hypothesis for La Meseta deposition but that a complete deltaic sequence is not present. If the La Meseta Formation does represent a deltaic deposit, only the delta-front is preserved. In addition, lateral changes in lithology have not been completely analyzed, without which distinction between a tidally influenced coastline and a delta cannot be made.
Taphonomy
Modes of preservation:body
Size of fossils:macrofossils
Collection methods and comments
Collection excludes:some macrofossils
Collection methods:survey of museum collection
Reason for describing collection:taxonomic analysis
Collectors:Prof. Andrzej Gazdzicki Collection dates:1988
Collection method comments: Collected during the Argentine-Polish Field Party of 1988.
Repository: Institue of Paleobiology of the Polish Academy of Sciences (ZPAL Bp.XXXIV)
Metadata
Database number:152834
Authorizer:M. Clapham Enterer:M. Manojlovic
Modifier:M. Clapham Research group:marine invertebrate
Created:2013-12-01 15:34:30 Last modified:2019-08-17 20:02:01
Access level:the public Released:2013-12-01 15:34:30
Creative Commons license:CC BY
Reference information

Primary reference:

49259. M. A. Bitner. 1991. A supposedly new brachiopod from the Paleogene of Seymour Island, West Antarctica. Polish Polar Research 12(2):243-246 [M. Clapham/M. Manojlovic]