Also known as #44 (Hickman)
Where: Polk County, Oregon (45.0° N, 123.2° W: paleocoordinates 45.3° N, 110.9° W)
• coordinate based on nearby landmark
• outcrop-level geographic resolution
When: Eugene Formation, Priabonian (38.0 - 33.9 Ma)
• Eugene Formation can be subdivided faunally: a lower unit correlating to the Keasey Fm, a middle unit correlating to the Gries Ranch Beds of WA, and a upper unit correlated with the Pittsburg Bluff Fm. Thickness of formation may be up to 15,000 feet, but probably around 5,000 feet. Most of the outcrops are scattered so it is difficult to estimate their relative stratigraphic placement
• bed-level stratigraphic resolution
Environment/lithology: transition zone or lower shoreface; lithified, tuffaceous, brown, gray, blue sandstone and tuffaceous, brown, gray, blue siltstone
•Hickman (1969): Several lines of evidence suggest that most of the Eugene Formation was deposited in shallow water, at depths no greater than 30 fathoms. The coarse, tuffaceous, and arkosic character of many beds and the interfingering of the Eugene Formation with non-marine tuffaceous rocks to the east and south indicates the proximity of the Oligocene shoreline. Although mollusks are generally not good indicators of depth, genera such as Panopea, Modiolus, Solen, and Spisula are presently restricted to depths of less than 40 fathoms. The high diversity of the benthonic fauna is an indication that the environment was not one of a bay or otherwise highly restricted environment. The absence of planktonic forms is typical of turbid, near-short environments. In the same units with these relatively undisturbed infauna! assemblages there are occasional thin layers of concentrated shell material which show definite signs of reworking and current sorting. The layers range from 1 to 10 cm in thickness and cannot be traced over great distances. The shells in these layers are small and include an admixture of infaunal and epifaunal species. The shells show little sign of wear or breakage, but many of the pelecypod valves are disarticulated, indicating some degree of transport. The scaphopods in these layers show parallel alignment by the current. There is also evidence that currents were intermittent and fluctuating in strength: the assemblages contain varying percentages of large shells mixed in with the smaller ones, and in some places there are higher proportions of broken and abraded shell debris mixed in.
Size class: macrofossils
Preservation: mold/impression, trace
Reposited in the CAS
Collection methods: quarrying,
• Collections held at University of Oregon, University of California, Californian Academy of Sciences (CAS), United States Geological Survey (USGS), and Stanford University (NP).
Primary reference: C. J. S. Hickman. 1969. The Oligocene marine molluscan fauna of the Eugene Formation in Oregon. University of Oregon Museum of Natural History Bulletin 16:1-112 [A. Miller/A. Hendy/P. Wagner]more details
Purpose of describing collection: taxonomic analysis
PaleoDB collection 39031: authorized by Austin Hendy, entered by Austin Hendy on 18.05.2004
Creative Commons license: CC BY (attribution)
Taxonomic list
Cephalopoda | |
Aturia angustata Conrad 1849 nautiloid | |
Bivalvia | |
"Nuculana washingtonensis" = Nuculana (Saccella) washingtonensis
"Nuculana washingtonensis" = Nuculana (Saccella) washingtonensis Weaver 1916 pointed nut clam | |
Acila (Truncacila) shumardi Dall 1909 divaricate nutclam | |
"Panopea (Panopea) ramonensis" = Panopea ramonensis
"Panopea (Panopea) ramonensis" = Panopea ramonensis Clark 1925 clam | |
Solena (Eosolen) eugenensis Clark 1925 clam | |
"Spisula pittsburgensis" = Mactromeris pittsburgensis
"Spisula pittsburgensis" = Mactromeris pittsburgensis Clark 1925 clam | |
Tellina aduncanasa tellin clam
Tellina pittsburgensis Clark 1925 tellin clam |