Also known as Amos Moses estate
Where: Cleveland County, Oklahoma (35.2° N, 97.4° W: paleocoordinates 2.8° N, 26.7° W)
• coordinate stated in text
• outcrop-level geographic resolution
When: Fairmont Shale Member (Hennessey Formation), Kungurian (279.3 - 272.3 Ma)
• bed 5 of general section of Olson (1967, Oklahoma Geol. Surv. Circ. 74), about 70 feet above the base of Hennessey Fm. Haglund (1977 J. Paleont. 51(5)) additionally states that the locality is in the "Fairmont Shale" of the Hennessey Fm. Haglund (1977) also states, that these beds are equivalents of the Choza Fm. of the Clear Fork Group of Texas. The base and top of the Clear Fork Group are both within the Kungurian: see Wardlaw 2005 (Permophiles) for the base, and DiMichele et al. 2001 (J Paleont) for the top. Original chronostratigraphic entry >>Leonardian<< is replaced by >>Kungurian<< (TL).
• group of beds-level stratigraphic resolution
Environment/lithology: fluvial-lacustrine; red shale and sandy shale
Size class: macrofossils
Preservation: coprolite
Collected by J. W. Stovall, E. C. Olson; reposited in the FMNH
• OUSM = Oklahoma University Stovall Museum, Oklahoma
Primary reference: E. C. Olson. 1970. New and little known genera and species of vertebrates from the Lower Permian of Oklahoma. Fieldiana: Geology 18(3):359-434 [J. Mueller/J. Dummasch/T. Liebrecht]more details
Purpose of describing collection: taxonomic analysis
PaleoDB collection 79531: authorized by Johannes Mueller, entered by Jana Dummasch on 12.03.2008, edited by Torsten Liebrecht and Graeme Lloyd
Creative Commons license: CC BY (attribution)
Taxonomic list
•"To date the excavation has covered an area of about 350 square feet and approximately 1,500 cubic feet of sediment have been examined for fossils. Although the specimens are somewhat clumped in occurrence, it can be estimated fairly that they average about three per cubic foot. Thus the total number of specimens in the materials studied ranges in the neighborhood of 4,500. Of these, of course, only a small part, several hundred, has been collected. Much of the material is very fragmentary and with a few exceptions only articulated specimens, skulls, jaws and well preserved single bones were kept. Over one-half of all specimens found pertain to Lysorophus, usually consisting of vertebrae and ribs. In general, remains of this amphibian were collected only when preservation was exceptionally good, much of an individual was present, or skulls were found, either alone or associated with skeletons [!]."
Osteichthyes | |
Dvellecanus carrolli n. gen. n. sp., Aletrimyti gaskillae n. gen. n. sp.
| |
"Lysorophus tricarinatus" = Brachydectes newberryi
"Lysorophus tricarinatus" = Brachydectes newberryi Cope 1868 amniote FMNH UR 1034, 1036, 1037, 1230-1233, 1240, 1288-1295
| |
Reptilia | |
Captorhinikos chozaensis Olson 1954 eureptile FMNH UR 183 (formerly referred to Labidosaurikos barkeri); OUSM 4-1-53
| |
Amphibia | |
Tersomius mosesi n. sp.
| |
"Goniorhynchus stovalli n. sp." = Rhynchonkos stovalli
"Goniorhynchus stovalli n. sp." = Rhynchonkos stovalli Olson 1970 tetrapod FMNH UR 1039, 1040, 1242-1248, 1284, 1341
| |
"Peronedon primus n. gen. n. sp." = Diplocaulus
| |
Osteichthyes | |
|