Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Haborophocoena minutus

Mammalia - Cetacea - Phocoenidae

Taxonomy
Haborophocoena minutus was named by Ichishima and Kimura (2009). Its type specimen is SMAC 1388, a partial skull, and it is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is Haboro, south, which is in a Zanclean coastal mudstone in the Embetsu Formation of Japan.

Synonymy list
YearName and author
2009Haborophocoena minutus Ichishima and Kimura p. 857 figs. Fig. 2-6
2015Haborophocoena minutus Colpaert et al. p. 9 figs. Figure 8

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
classMammalia
RankNameAuthor
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Placentalia
Boreoeutheria
Laurasiatheria
Scrotifera
Euungulata
Artiodactylamorpha
Artiodactyla()
Whippomorpha
orderCetacea
Pelagiceti
Neoceti
suborderOdontoceti
infraorderDelphinida
superfamilyDelphinoidea
familyPhocoenidae()
genusHaborophocoena
speciesminutus

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Haborophocoena minutus Ichishima and Kimura 2009
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
H. Ichishima and M. Kimura 2009Haborophocoena minutus is a relatively small phocoenid for the Early Pliocene. It is
distinguished from Lomacetus, Australithax, Salumiphocaena, and Piscolithax in having
the premaxillary foramen lying anteromedial to the premaxillary eminence at the
level of the anterior margin of the eminence (this feature is shared with living
forms), just posterior to the level of the antorbital notch; from any other phocoenids,
living and extinct (except for Piscolithax tedfordi and H. toyoshimai), in having a more
posteriorly situated frontal boss at or near the level of the base of the zygomatic
process of the squamosal; from any other phocoenid, living and extinct (except for
Phocoenoides and H. toyoshimai) in having a relatively small temporal fossa; and from
any other phocoenid, living and extinct (except for H. toyoshimai) in having a narrowbased
rostrum relative to the supraorbital width. H. minutus differs from H. toyoshimai
in that: the skull is absolutely smaller (ca. 80% in parietal width and ca. 72% in
cranium length); on the dorsal face of the rostrum the premaxilla makes up less than half the mediolateral width of the rostrum at the level of the antorbital notch; the
skull is less skewed; the posteromedial corner of the ascending process of the maxilla
is less protruded medially toward the vertex; the curled crest of the maxilla, which is
continuous with the posterior premaxillary termination, does not reach the knob-like
process of the frontal on the vertex; the premaxillary eminence is lower and flatter;
the anterior tip of the prenarial triangular area, on which the nasal plug muscle
must have been attached, lies well anterior to the level of the antorbital notch; the
lateral wall of the pterygoid sinus fossa formed by the laminae of the palatine and the
pterygoid is ventrally much less expanded; a ridge dividing the horizontal lamina
from the lateral lamina of the palatine is less sharp and not constricted medially; the temporal fossa is larger: in H. toyoshimai the greatest diameter of the temporal fossa is
shorter than the length of the orbit, whereas in H. minutus it is as long as the length
of the orbit; the zygomatic process is not tapered anteriorly but rectangular in lateral
profile; a distinct ridge divides a fossa on the lateral face of the base of the zygomatic
process into dorsal and ventral halves; the angle of the “ectethmoid shields” opposite
the horizontal plane of the rostrum is much flatter; the mesethmoid septum that
separates the nares from each other is higher posteriorly; and the mesorostral groove
attains the maximum width well anterior to the level of the antorbital notch as
preserved. The degree of inclination of the long axis of the occipital condyle from
the sagittal plane also makes H. minutus (∼30◦) different from H. toyoshimai with a
more vertical long axis (∼20◦).