Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Neotherium
Taxonomy
Neotherium was named by Kellogg (1931) [Sepkoski's age data: T Mi-m Sepkoski's reference number: 2].
It was assigned to Allodesmidae by Kellogg (1931); to Dusignathinae by Repenning and Tedford (1977); to Imagotarinae by Horikawa (1995); to Odobenini by McKenna and Bell (1997); to Carnivora by Sepkoski (2002); to Odobaenidae by Carroll (1988), Deméré (1994), Rice (1998), Deméré et al. (2003), Kohno (2006); to Imagotariinae by Barnes (1988), Barnes (1989), Kohno et al. (1995), Barnes (2008); and to Odobenidae by Berta (2002), Berta (2009), Boessenecker and Churchill (2013), Berta (2017), Velez-Juarbe (2018), Magallanes et al. (2018), Berta (2018), Berta et al. (2018), Tonomori (2022).
It was assigned to Allodesmidae by Kellogg (1931); to Dusignathinae by Repenning and Tedford (1977); to Imagotarinae by Horikawa (1995); to Odobenini by McKenna and Bell (1997); to Carnivora by Sepkoski (2002); to Odobaenidae by Carroll (1988), Deméré (1994), Rice (1998), Deméré et al. (2003), Kohno (2006); to Imagotariinae by Barnes (1988), Barnes (1989), Kohno et al. (1995), Barnes (2008); and to Odobenidae by Berta (2002), Berta (2009), Boessenecker and Churchill (2013), Berta (2017), Velez-Juarbe (2018), Magallanes et al. (2018), Berta (2018), Berta et al. (2018), Tonomori (2022).
Species
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1931 | Neotherium Kellogg p. 296 |
1977 | Neotherium Repenning and Tedford p. 55 |
1988 | Neotherium Barnes p. 2 |
1988 | Neotherium Carroll |
1989 | Neotherium Barnes p. 23 |
1994 | Neotherium Deméré p. 113 |
1995 | Neotherium Horikawa p. 322 figs. Table 4 |
1995 | Neotherium Kohno et al. p. 297 |
1997 | Neotherium McKenna and Bell p. 255 |
1998 | Neotherium Rice |
2002 | Neotherium Berta p. 923 |
2002 | Neotherium Sepkoski |
2003 | Neotherium Deméré et al. p. 49 figs. Fig. 3.3 |
2006 | Neotherium Kohno p. 418 |
2008 | Neotherium Barnes p. 531 |
2009 | Neotherium Berta p. 863 |
2013 | Neotherium Boessenecker and Churchill p. 10 fig. 8 |
2017 | Neotherium Berta p. 156 |
2018 | Neotherium Berta p. 714 figs. Fig. 3 |
2018 | Neotherium Berta et al. p. 217 figs. Fig. 6 |
2018 | Neotherium Magallanes et al. p. 30 figs. Fig. 14 |
2018 | Neotherium Velez-Juarbe p. 2 |
2022 | Neotherium Tonomori p. 52 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
J. Velez-Juarbe 2018 | Small- to moderate-sized pinniped, with body length estimated between 1.84 and 2.21 m (estimates based on formulas from Churchill et al., 2015). Distinguished from other odobenids by displaying the following combination of characters of the skull: ascending process of premaxilla with short overlap with nasals (c. 3[1]), shared with Pseudotaria muramotoi Kohno, 2006, and later odobenids); flat palate (c. 9[0]), shared with Prototaria primigena Takeyama and Ozawa, 1984, Proneotherium repenningi Kohno et al., 1995, and Kamtschatarctos sinelnikovae Dubrovo, 1981; palatines that are long and posterolaterally expanded (c. 11[1]), as in K. sinelni- kovae, and more derived odobenids (except odobenines); supraorbital process of frontal absent (c. 16[1]), shared with Imagotaria downsi Mitchell, 1968, Pontolis magnus (True, 1905), ‘dusignathines,’ and odobenines; narrow, parallel-sided interorbital bar (c. 17[1]), as in K. sinelnikovae, Pseudotaria muramotoi, I. downsi, and Pontolis magnus; deep glenoid fossa (c. 26[0]), shared with Prototaria spp., Proneotherium repen- ningi, K. sinelnikovae, Ps. muramotoi, and Archaeodobenus akamatsui Tanaka and Kohno, 2015; and presence of pseudo- sylvian sulcus on lateral surface of braincase (c. 28[0]), shared with Prototaria spp. and P. repenningi; flattened, plate-like paroccipital processes (c. 34[3]), shared with Ps. muramotoi and all latter odobenids. Furthermore, amongst odobenids, the dental morphology of Neotherium mirum is characterized by lack of tusk-like canines (c. 55[0]), differing from ‘dusignathines’ and odobenines; possession of a bilobed lower
canine root (c. 59[1]), shared with Imagotaria downsi and Pelagiarctos spp.; laterally compressed postcanine crowns (c. 63[0]), shared with P. repenningi and K. sinelnikovae; p1 with labial cingulum; presence of a reduced metaconid (c. 70[1]), as in K. sinelnikovae, Pelagiarctos spp., and A. akamatsui; double- rooted p2–4 (c. 72[0], 73[0]), differing from Imagotaria downsi, ‘dusignathines,’ and odobenines; bilobed to single-rooted m2 (differing from the double-rooted condition in K. sinelnikovae); triple-rooted M1 (c. 77[0]), as in Prototaria spp., P. repenningi, and K. sinelnikovae; double-rooted m1 (c. 79[0]), thus differing from LACM 135920, ‘dusignathines,’ and Aivukus cedrosensis Repenning and Tedford, 1977; and m2 present (c. 81[0]), differ- ing from some Imagotaria downsi, ‘dusignathines,’ and odobe- nines. The postcranial skeleton of Neotherium mirum shows odobenid synapomorphies such as medial lip of distal trochlea of humerus with diameter greater than distal capitulum (c. 84[1]); distal end of radius expanded with large radial process (c. 85[2]); metacarpal I with a pit marking the insertion of extensor pollicis (c. 86[1]), shared with I. downsi, Po. magnus, Dusignathus santacruzensis Kellogg, 1927, Gomphotaria pug- nax Barnes and Raschke, 1991, and Pliopedia pacifica Kellogg, 1921; presence of a pit for the magnum on the scapholunar (c.87[1]); and calcaneum with medially prominent calcaneal tuber (c. 89[1]). Modified from Demere (1994b). |