| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Taxonomy
Aureia was named by Meekin et al. (2024).
It was assigned to Odontoceti by Robinson et al. (2024) and Meekin et al. (2024).
It was assigned to Odontoceti by Robinson et al. (2024) and Meekin et al. (2024).
Species
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 2024 | Aureia Meekin et al. p. 4 figs. Figs. 1-3 |
| 2024 | Aureia Robinson et al. p. 580 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
| Reference | Diagnosis | |
|---|---|---|
| S. Meekin et al. 2024 | A. rerehua has features common in other stem odontocetes and some platanistoids; a subcircular fossa in the periotic fossa sensu de Muizon (1987), ventrally deflected anterior processes on the periotics, anterior spines on the tympanic bullae, distinct premaxillary clefts, and well developed antorbital notches (de Muizon 1987; Geisler and Sanders 2003; Geisler et al. 2011, 2012; Murakami et al. 2012a, 2012b; Tanaka and Fordyce 2014; Tanaka and Fordyce 2015b; Gaetán et al. 2018). A. rerehua is most like Otekaikea and Waipatia, with an attenuated rostrum, procumbent incisors, fossa for the articular rim of the periotic, and shallow fossae for the sternomastoid muscle (Moore 1968; de Muizon 1987; Tanaka and Fordyce 2015b, 2014, 2017).
A. rerehua has unique basioccipital crests with posteroventral projections, a rectangu- lar nuchal crest, flat ventral surfaces on the posterior process of the periotic, laterally splayed teeth, and a process on the subtemporal crest. Waipatiid-like odontocetes have developed vertices. The vertex of A. rerehua is less pronounced than W. maerewhenua or Otekaikea, shown in Figure 1C, possessing a flatter face like Papahu taitapu (Fordyce 1994; Aguirre-Fernández and Fordyce 2014; Tanaka and Fordyce 2014, 2015b). The posterior skull is straighter and steeper than that of other waipatiid-like odontocetes, making the lateral profile of the skull triangular. |